中国石油智能地震处理解释技术进展与发展方向思考

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2021.05.002

摘要/Abstract

摘要： “十三五”期间，中国石油天然气股份有限公司（简称中国石油）紧跟国际人工智能发展形势和物探领域的重大需求，在地震处理、解释环节超前谋划，积极布局，有力推动了物探技术向智能化发展，形成了智能地震处理和智能地震解释两大技术系列，并创新研发了智能地震标签数据集构建软件；同时，创新研发模式，牵头组建了由北京大学等组成“6+1”智能物探“产学研”联盟，有效推动了中国石油智能物探技术创新工作，实现了与国际智能物探技术的同步发展。“十四五”期间，中国石油将围绕公司的“数字化转型，智能化发展”战略，顺应全球能源转型和智能化发展趋势，明确“123456”的发展思路和方向；立足模块替代，探索流程再造，积极推动智能地震处理解释技术创新发展与落地见效。其中，在人力密集型环节实现智能模块替代，提高地震处理解释效率，支撑实际生产提效降本；在技术密集型环节实现智能流程再造，提高地震处理解释精度，引领物探技术创新发展，形成世界一流的智能地震处理解释技术系列，实现智能物探科技自立自强，全面推进中国石油物探业务智能化发展，最终实现智能化找油找气，并为水平井钻井提供实时导向。

关键词: 中国石油, 地震处理解释, 智能化, 发展方向

Abstract: During the 13th Five-Year Plan period, PetroChina has kept up with the development trend of advanced artificial intelligence and major needs in the fi eld of geophysical prospecting, planned in advance and actively deployed researches, which highly promotes the development of intelligent geophysical technology. Till now, two major technology series of intelligent seismic processing and interpretation have been developed, and intelligent seismic software platform and label data set software been released. Meanwhile, PetroChina has led an innovative “6+1” intelligent “industry-university-research institute” alliance for geophysical exploration consisting of Peking University, etc., which effectively promotes the innovation of PetroChina intelligent geophysical technology and achieves the synchronous development with the international intelligent geophysical technology. During the 14th Five-Year Plan period, PetroChina will focus on the strategy of “digital transformation and intelligent development” and clarify the development plan and direction of “123456”, so as to conform to the global energy transformation and intelligent development trend. Based on module replacement, PetroChina will actively explore process regeneration and promote the innovative development and application of intelligent seismic processing and interpretation technology. In labor-intensive scenarios, intelligent module replacement will be implemented to improve effi ciency of seismic processing and interpretation, support industrial production to improve effi ciency and reduce costs. Meanwhile, in technology-intensive scenarios, intelligent process will be regenerated to improve accuracy of seismic processing and interpretation, forming a world-class series of intelligent seismic processing and interpretation technologies, and realizing the self-reliance of intelligent geophysical exploration technology, which supports to comprehensively promote the intelligent development of geophysical business of PetroChina, ultimately achieves the intelligent petroleum exploration, and provides realtime guidance for horizontal well drilling.

中图分类号:

P631.4

赵邦六, 雍学善, 高建虎, 常德宽, 杨存, 李海山. 中国石油智能地震处理解释技术进展与发展方向思考[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(5): 12-23.

Zhao Bangliu, Yong Xueshan, Gao Jianhu, Chang Dekuan, Yang Cun, Li Haishan. Progress and development direction of PetroChina intelligent seismic processing and interpretation technology[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2021, 26(5): 12-23.

参考文献

[1] Serfaty Y, Itan L, Chase D, et al . Wavefield separation via principle component analysis and deep learning in the local angle domain[C]. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2017. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2017:991-995.
[2] Wang F, Chen S. Residual learning of deep convolutional neural network for seismic random noise attenuation[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2019,16(8):1314-1318.
[3] Dong X T, Li Y, Yang B J. Desert low-frequency noise s u p p r e s s i o n b y u s i n g a d a p t i v e DnCNNs b a s e d o n t h e determination of high-order statistic[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2019,219(2):1281-1299.
[4] Chang D, Yang W, Yong X, et al . Seismic data Interpolation u s i n g d u a l - d o m a i n c o n d i t i o n a l g e n e r a t i v e a d v e r s a r i a l networks[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2020,99:1-5.
[5] Lewis W, Vigh D. Deep learning prior models from seismic images for full-waveform inversion[C]. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2017. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2017:1512-1517.
[6] Mosser L, Kimman W, Dramsch J, et al . Rapid seismic domain transfer: seismic velocity inversion and modeling using deep generative neural networks[C]. 80th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, 2018.
[7] Farris S, Araya-Polo M, Jennings J, et al . Tomography: a deep learning vs full-waveform inversion comparison[C]. First EAGE Workshop on High Performance Computing for UP Stream in Latin America. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2018:1-5.
[8] Yang F, Ma J. Deep-learning inversion: a next generation seismic velocity-model building method[J]. Geophysics, 2019, 84(4):1-133.
[9] Picetti F, Lipari V, Bestagini P, et al . A generative adversarial network for seismic imaging applications[C]. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2018. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2018:2231-2235.
[10] Lu Y, Sun H, Wang X, et al . Improving the image quality of elastic reverse-time migration in the dip-angle domain using deep learning[J]. Geophysics, 2020,85(5):269-283.
[11] He Q, Wang Y. Reparameterized full-waveform inversion using deep neural networks[J]. Geophysics, 2021,86(1):1-13.
[12] Liu B, Yang S, Ren Y, et al . Deep-learning seismic fullwaveform inversion for realistic structural models[J]. Geophysics, 2021,86(1):31-44.
[13] Huang L, Dong X, Clee T E. A scalable deep learning platform for identifying geologic features from seismic attributes [J]. The Leading Edge, 2017,36(3):249-256.
[14] Wu X, Shi Y, Fomel S, et al . FaultNet3D: predicting fault probabilities, strikes, and dips with a single convolutional neural network[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2019,57(11):9138-9155.
[15] Geng Z, Wu X, Shi Y, et al . Deep learning for relative geologic time and seismic horizons[J]. Geophysics, 2020,85(4): 87-100.
[16] Duan Y, Zheng X, Hu L, et al . Seismic facies analysis based on deep convolutional embedded clustering[J]. Geophysics, 2019, 84(6):87-97.
[17] Liu M, Jervis M, Li W, et al . Seismic facies classification using supervised convolutional neural networks and semisupervised generative adversarial networks[J]. Geophysics, 2020,85(4): 47-58.
[18] Biswas R, Sen M K, Das V, et al . Prestack and post-stack inversion using a physics-guided convolutional neural network[J]. Interpretation, 2019,7(3):161-174.
[19] Wu Y, Mcmechan G A. Parametric convolutional neural network-domain full-waveform inversion[J]. Geophysics, 2019, 84(6):881-896.
[20] Cui R, Cao D, Liu Q, et al . VP and VS prediction from digital rock images using a combination of U-Net and convolutional neural networks[J]. Geophysics, 2021,86(1):27-37.
[21] 韩卫雪，周亚同，池越．基于深度学习卷积神经网络的地震数据随机噪声去除[J]. 石油物探，2018,57(6):862-869. Han Weixue, Zhou Yatong, Chi Yue. Deep learning convolutional neural networks for random noise attenuation in seismic data[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2018, 57(6):862-869.
[22] 王钰清，陆文凯，刘金林，等．2019. 基于数据增广和CNN 的地震随机噪声压制[J]. 地球物理学报，2019,62(1): 421-433. Wang Yuqing, Lu Wenkai, Liu Jinlin, et al . Random seismic noise attenuation based on data augmentation and CNN[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2019,62(1):421-433.
[23] 唐杰，孟涛，张文征，等．利用基于深度学习的过完备字典信号稀疏表示算法压制地震随机噪声[J]. 石油地球物理勘探，2020,55(6): 1202-1209. Tang Jie, Meng Tao, Zhang Wenzheng, et al . Suppressing seismic random noise based on Deep-KSVD[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2020,55(6):1202-1209.
[24] 张岩，李新月，王斌，等．基于联合深度学习的地震数据随机噪声压制[J]. 石油地球物理勘探. 2021,56(1):9-25,56. Zhang Yan, Li Xinyue, Wang Bin, et al . Random noise suppression of seismic data based on joint deep learning[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2021,56(1):9-25,56.
[25] 陈德武，杨午阳，魏新建，等．基于混合网络U-SegNet 的地震初至自动拾取[J]. 石油地球物理勘探，2020,55(6):1188-1201. Chen Dewu, Yang Wuyang, Wei Xinjian, et al . Automatic picking of seismic first arrivals based on hybrid network U-SegNet[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2020,55(6):1188-1201.
[26] 周创，居兴国，李子昂，等．基于深度卷积生成对抗网络的地震初至拾取[J]. 石油物探，2020,59(5):795-803. Zhou Chuang, Ju Xingguo, Li Ziang, et al. A deep convolutional generative adversarial network for first-arrival pickup from seismic data[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2020, 59(5):795-803.
[27] 张昊，朱培民，顾元，等．基于深度学习的地震速度谱自动拾取方法[J]. 石油物探，2019,58(5):724-733. Zhang Hao, Zhu Peimin, Gu Yuan, et al . Velocity auto picking from seismic velocity spectra based on deep learning[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2019,58(5):724-733.
[28] 魏伯阳，潘保芝，殷秋丽，等．基于条件生成对抗网络的成像测井图像裂缝计算机识别[J]. 石油物探，2020,59(2):295-302. Wei Boyang, Pan Baozhi, Yin Qiuli, et al . Identification of image logging data based on conditional generation adversarial network[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2020,59(2): 295-302.
[29] 王俊，曹俊兴，尤加春．基于GRU 神经网络的测井曲线重构[J]. 石油地球物理勘探，2020,55(3):510-520. Wang Jun, Cao Junxing, You Jiachun. Reconstruction of logging traces based on GRU neural network[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2020,55(3):510-520.
[30] 常德宽，雍学善，王一惠，等．基于深度卷积神经网络的地震数据断层识别方法[J]. 石油地球物理勘探，2021,56(1):1-8. Chang Dekuan, Yong Xueshan, Wang Yihui, et al . Seismic fault interpretation based on deep convolutional neural networks[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2021, 56(1): 1-8.
[31] 陈芊澍，文晓涛，何健，等．基于极限学习机的裂缝带预测[J]. 石油物探， 2021,60(1):149-156. Chen Qianshu, Wen Xiaotao, He Jian, et al . Prediction of a fracture zone using an extreme learning machine[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2021,60(1):149-156.
[32] 丁燕，杜启振，Qamar Yasin，等．基于深度学习的裂缝预测在S 区潜山碳酸盐岩储层中的应用[J]. 石油物探，2020,59(2):267-275. Ding Yan, Du Qizhen, Qamar Yasin, et al ．Fracture prediction based on deep learning application to a buried hill carbonate reservoir in the S area[J]．Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2020,59(2):267-275.
[33] 闫星宇，顾汉明，罗红梅，等．基于改进深度学习方法的地震相智能识别[J]. 石油地球物理勘探，2020, 55(6): 1169-1177. Yan Xingyu, Gu Hanming, Luo Hongmei, et al . Intelligent seismic facies classification based on an improved deep learning method[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2020,55(6):1169-1177.
[34] 何海清，范土芝，郭绪杰，等．中国石油“十三五”油气勘探重大成果与“十四五”发展战略[J]. 中国石油勘探，2021,26(1):17-30. He Haiqing, Fan Tuzhi, Guo Xujie, et al . Major achievements in oil and gas exploration of PetroChina during the 13th Five- Year Plan period and its development strategy for the 14th Five-Year Plan [J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2021,26(1): 17-30.
[35] 杜金虎，时付更，杨剑锋，等．中国石油上游业务信息化建设总体蓝图[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020,25(5):1-8. Du Jinhu, Shi Fugeng, Yang Jianfeng, et al . Overall blueprint of information construction of PetroChina upstream business[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020,25(5):1-8.
[36] 宋林伟，王小善，许海涛，等．梦想云推动地震资料处理解释一体化应用[J]. 中国石油勘探，2020,25(5):43-49. Song Linwei, Wang Xiaoshan, Xu Haitao, et al . Application and practice of integrated seismic data processing and interpretation driven by E&P Dream Cloud[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020,25(5):43-49.
[37] 谢玉洪，高阳东．中国海油近期国内勘探进展与勘探方向[J]. 中国石油勘探，2020,25(1):20-30. Xie Yuhong, Gao Yangdong. Recent domestic exploration progress and direction of CNOOC[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020,25(1):20-30.
[38] 杨午阳，魏新建，何欣．应用地球物理+AI 的智能化物探技术发展策略[J]. 石油科技论坛，2019,38(5):40-47. Yang Wuyang, Wei Xinjian, He Xin. Development plan for intelligent geophysical prospecting technology of applied geophysical+AI[J]. Oil Forum, 2019,38(5):40-47.