电导率异常检测裂缝识别方法与应用——以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组深层低渗透砂岩为例

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 受构造作用与地应力影响，鄂尔多斯盆地局部地区延长组深层低渗透砂岩储层裂缝发育。为了系统识别与评价裂缝，对倾角测井电阻率与极板方位曲线进行处理，阐述了电导率异常检测的直观成图法，并通过与电成像解释结果对比，总结不同类型裂缝的响应特征，进一步探讨了该方法的适用条件。通过实际资料处理，认为在低渗透砂岩地层，裂缝开度越大，钻井液侵入造成的高导（低阻）特征越明显，电导率异常检测可直观识别开度大于45μm 的裂缝，并可准确判断裂缝走向、裂缝高度、裂缝倾角及地层最大水平主应力方向等信息；对于开度小于45μm 的裂缝，识别精度较低。对裂缝发育的低渗透储层研究区，该方法可有效识别裂缝及评价裂缝参数。

关键词: 地层倾角测井, 电导率异常检测, 低渗透砂岩, 裂缝识别, 地层倾角测井, 电导率异常检测, 低渗透砂岩, 裂缝识别

Abstract: Due to impacts of tectonic activities and crustal stresses, deep low-permeability sandstone reservoir formations of Yanchang Formation in certain parts of the Ordos Basin contain well-developed fractures. To identify and assess these fractures, dipmeter logging conductivities and polar plate orientation plots were processed to generate direct mapping technique for detection of conductivity anomalies. Through comparison with electric imaging interpretation results, responses of various fractures were identified to further clarify application conditions of the technique. Through processing of actual data, it is determined that higher fracture apertures in the low-permeability sandstone formations may lead to more obvious features of high conductivity (low resistance) induced by drilling fluids. By way of conductivity anomaly detection, fractures with apertures over 45 μm can be identified directly. In addition, orientations, heights, dips and directions of maximum horizontal stresses in such formations can be determined accurately. As for fractures with apertures below 45 μm, the technique reveals lower accuracy in identification. Generally, the technique can be deployed in low-permeability reservoir formations with fractures developed to identify fractures and assess fracture parameters effectively.

Key words: dipmeter logging, conductivity anomaly detection, low-permeability sandstone, fracture identification, dipmeter logging, conductivity anomaly detection, low-permeability sandstone, fracture identification

段昕婷, 陈义国, 贺永红, 史鹏, 吴凤, 杨超. 电导率异常检测裂缝识别方法与应用——以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组深层低渗透砂岩为例[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2016, 21(1): 89-94.

Duan Xinting, Chen Yiguo, He Yonghong, Shi Peng, Wu Feng, Yang Chao. Application of conductivity anomaly detection technique for fracture identification: a case study on deep low-permeability sandstone in Yanchang Formation, the Ordos Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2016, 21(1): 89-94.

参考文献

[1] 王志章. 裂缝性油藏描述及预测[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社,1999:45-51. Wa n g Z h i z h a n g . F r a c t u r e d r e s e r v o i r d e s c r i p t i o n a n d prediction[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1999:45-51.
[2] 李哲, 汤军, 张云鹏, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地下寺湾地区长8 储层裂缝特征研究[J]. 岩性油气藏,2012,24(5):65-69. L i Zh e , Ta n g J u n , Zh a n g Yu n p e n g , e t a l . F r a c t u r e characteristics of Chang 8 reservoir of Yanchang Formation in Xiasiwan aera, Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoir, 2012,24(5):65-69.
[3] N e l s o n R A. G e o l o g i c a n a l y s i s o f n a t u r a l l y f r a c t u r e d reservoir[M]. Gulf Professional Publishing, 2001:269-273. [4] 田甜, 王海红, 郑荣才, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地镇原地区长8 油层组低渗透储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏,2014,26(1):29-35. Tian Tian, Wang Haihong, Zheng Rongcai, et al . Low permeability reservoir characteristics of Chang 8 oil reservoir set in Zhenyuan area, Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoir, 2014,26(1):29-35.
[5] 刘伟刚, 周立发, 高淑静. 鄂尔多斯盆地中西部三叠系延长组裂缝特征研究[J]. 岩性油气藏,2012,24(6):66-71. Liu Weigang, Zhou Lifa, Gao Shujing. Fracture characteristics of the Triassic Yanchang Formation in the midwest of Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoir, 2012,24(6):66-71.
[6] 史建南, 唐国龙, 吴警, 等. 姬塬油田延长组长9 油层组区域成藏差异性研究[J]. 岩性油气藏，2014,26(1):25-28. Shi Jiannan, Tang Guolong, Wu Jing, et al . Study on the regional accumulation differences of Chang 9 oil reservoir set Jiyuan oilefield[J]. Lithologic Reservoir, 2014,26(1):25-28.
[7] 徐美娥，尹伟，陈冬，等. 鄂尔多斯盆地红河油田延长组致密砂岩储层反演预测[J]. 中国石油勘探，2015,20(1):63-68. Xu Meie, Yin Wei, Chen Dong, et al . Inversion prediction o f t i g h t s a n d s t o n e r e s e r v o i r o f Y a n g c h a n g Fo rmat i o n of Honghe oilfield in Ordos Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2015,20(1):63-68.
[8] 王冠贵, 谌海云, 孙嘉戌. 地层倾角测井原理与应用[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社,2008: 73-75. Wang Guiguan, Shen Haiyun, Sun Jiaxu, Diplog principle and application[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2008:73-75.
[9] 张占松. 地层倾角测井资料处理与解释[M]. 武汉: 武汉工业大学出版社，1998:162-167. Zhang Zhansong. Diplog data processing and interpretation[M]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology Press, 1998:162-167.
[10] 冯敬英, 刘争平. 地层倾角测井处理及构造解释[M]. 成都: 成都科技大学出版社,1997:273-275. Feng Jingying, Liu Zhengping. Diplog processing and tectonic interpretation[M].Chengdu:Chengdu Science University Press, 1997:273-275.
[11] 陈义国, 张丽霞, 赵谦平, 等. 三介质模型常规测井变尺度极差分析裂缝预测技术[J]. 断块油气田,2012,19(1):84-87. Chen Yiguo, Zhang Lixia, Zhao Qianping, et al . Fracture prediction using rescaled range analysis and based on conventional logging data of triple media model[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2012,19(1):84-87.
[12] 周灿灿, 杨春顶. 砂岩裂缝的成因及其常规测井资料综合识别技术研究[J]. 石油地球物理勘探,2003,38 (4):425-430. Zhou Cancan, Yang Chunding. Contributing factor of sandstone fracture and its integrated identifying technology for regular logging data[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2003,38(4):425-430.
[13] 王兆生, 唐晓梅, 陶娴娴, 等. 某区块储层裂缝特征及其对注气开发的影响[J]. 断块油气田,2013,20(2):183-185. W a n g Z h a o s h e n g , T a n g X i a o m e i , T a o X i a n x i a n ,e t al .Characteristics of reservoir fracture and its influence on gas injection in one block[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2013,20(2):183-185.
[14] 王兴龙, 邓宏文, 穆贵鹏, 等. 浅析低渗透砂岩储层特征与形成机理[J]. 岩性油气藏,2012,24(3):56-60.Wang Xinglong, Deng Hongwen, Mu Guipeng, et al .Characteristics and formation mechanism of low permeabilitysandstone reservoirs[J]. Lithologic Reservoir,2012,24(3):56-60.
[15] 邓攀, 陈孟晋, 高哲荣, 等. 火山岩储层构造裂缝的测井识别及解释[J]. 石油学报,2002,23(6):32-36.Deng Pan, Chen Mengjin, Gao Zherong, et al . Volcaniclogging identification and interpretation of the reservoirstructural fractures[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2002,23(6):32-36.
[16] 文静, 何幼斌, 吴彩雄, 等. 地层倾角测井的地质应用[J]. 江汉石油学院学报,2008,30(1):263-265.Wen Jing, He Youbin, Wu Caixiong, et al . The geological application of diplog[J]. Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute, 2008,30(1):263-265.