鄂尔多斯盆地西南缘三叠系延长组流体包裹体特征及对油气充注调整的指示

中国石油勘探

• • 下一篇

鄂尔多斯盆地西南缘三叠系延长组流体包裹体特征及对油气充注调整的指示

梁正中¹，许红涛²，高超利³，肖荣³，杨红新³，边延河³，王彩霞³

1 榆林学院化学与化工学院；2 西安石油大学石油工程学院；3 延长油田股份有限公司勘探开发技术研究中心

作者简介:梁正中（1978-），男，湖北潜江人，博士后，2009 年毕业于中国科学院广州地球化学研究所，副教授，现主要从事油气勘探综合地质研究工作。地址：陕西省榆林市崇文路榆林学院化学与化工学院，邮政编码：719000。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目“异常低压盆地压力场演化对页岩气富集的影响机理研究”（42062011）；陕西省科学技术厅重点研发计划“神府地区煤系非常规天然气共生聚集机制及开发潜力评价”（2020SF-369）；榆林市科技局项目“神木地区致密气富集主控因素与勘探技术对策研究”（CXY-2022-73）；榆林市高新区科技计划“双碳目标下榆林及周缘地区煤层气和页岩气清洁能源协同勘探开发研究”（CXY-2021-09）。

Characteristics of fluid inclusion and its indication to hydrocarbon charge and adjustment of the Triassic Yanchang Formation in southwestern margin of Ordos Basin

Liang Zhengzhong¹, Xu Hongtao², Gao Chaoli³, Xiao Rong³, Yang Hongxin³, Bian Yanhe³, Wang Caixia³

1 School of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, Yulin University; 2 College of Petroleum Engineering, Xi’an Shiyou University;
3 Exploration and Development Technology Research Center, Yanchang Oil Field Co., Ltd.

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 随着鄂尔多斯盆地西南缘彭阳地区三叠系延长组长8 段油藏的发现，证实该区具有较大勘探潜力，但整体研究程度薄弱，其油水关系异常复杂、油气充注规律不明确。油气充注过程中形成的流体包裹体可为研究油气充注过程提供依据，通过系统的流体包裹体显微鉴定、均一温度测试和热动力学模拟等包裹体分析手段，结合颗粒荧光定量测试技术，探讨了盆缘长8 段油气充注—调整的过程并比较了盆内外成藏差异性。结果表明: 研究区油气包裹体较为发育，原油成熟度不高，含油显示级别和今古含油饱和度均低于湖盆内部，整体充注强度较低。油气较大规模充注主要发生在早白垩世末期和晚白垩世早期，有限源储压差为研究区近源短距离运移提供了动力；但成藏动力不及盆内主体区块，限制了边缘地区油气富集饱满程度。同时，颗粒荧光定量分析（QGF）和颗粒萃取物荧光定量分析（QGF-E）得出的数据变化趋势不一致，指示了研究区古油水界面的位置变化或油藏遭受调整的特征。盆地西南缘断裂附近后期构造运动对油气藏的调整/ 破坏影响大，由此进一步减弱长8 段油藏充注规模。深化研究盆缘油气的充注成藏规律和演化过程，对于认识不同构造背景下的低渗致密砂岩油气勘探潜力具有较强指导意义。

关键词: 延长组, 流体包裹体, 油气充注, 成藏动力, 鄂尔多斯盆地

Abstract: With the deepening of petroleum exploration, new discoveries have been made in tight reservoirs in the eighth member of the Triassic Yanchang Formation (Chang 8 member) in Pengyang area in the southwestern margin of Ordos Basin, indicating a great exploration potential. However, the overall research level is low, such as the extremely complex oil-water contact and the unclear law of hydrocarbon charging. The fluid inclusions provide a basis for analyzing the process of hydrocarbon charging. By using fluid inclusion testing methods such as microscopic observation, homogenization temperature measurement and PVT simulation, as well as the quantitative grain fluorescence (QGF) experimental technology, the process of hydrocarbon accumulation and adjustment in Chang 8 member is discussed and the difference of hydrocarbon accumulation in the interior of the basin and basin margin is analyzed. The study results show that oil and gas inclusions are relatively developed in the study area, the maturity of crude oil is low, the oil display grade and modern/paleo oil saturation are lower than those in the interior of the lake basin, showing an overall low intensity of hydrocarbon charging. The large-scale hydrocarbon charging events mainly occurred at the end of Early Cretaceous and the early stage of Late Cretaceous. The limited pressure difference between source rock and reservoir provided driving force for the short-distance hydrocarbon migration, but it was lower in the study area than that in blocks in the main basin, which led to a low oil saturation in the basin marginal area. The relationship between quantitative grain fluorescence (QGF) and quantitative grain extract fluorescence (QGF-E) indexes shows an inconsistent trend, indicating the change of the paleo oil-water contact or the adjustment of oil reservoir in the study area. The later tectonic movements greatly adjusted/destroyed oil reservoir near the faults in the southwestern basin margin, which further decreased the scale of oil charging in Chang 8 member. The deep research on oil charging and accumulation laws and evolution process of oil reservoir in the basin margin has a great guiding significance for identifying the exploration potential of low-permeability tight oil and gas sandstone reservoir in various tectonic settings.

中图分类号:

TE122.1

梁正中, 许红涛, 高超利, 肖荣, 杨红新, 边延河, 王彩霞. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南缘三叠系延长组流体包裹体特征及对油气充注调整的指示[J]. 中国石油勘探.

Liang Zhengzhong, Xu Hongtao, Gao Chaoli, Xiao Rong, Yang Hongxin, Bian Yanhe, Wang Caixia. Characteristics of fluid inclusion and its indication to hydrocarbon charge and adjustment of the Triassic Yanchang Formation in southwestern margin of Ordos Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration.

[1]	何发岐, 张宇, 王付斌, 张茹, 张威, 齐荣, 安川, 黎小伟, 邓杰. 鄂尔多斯盆地中国石化“十三五”油气勘探进展与新领域[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2022, 27(5): 1-12.
[2]	郭秋麟, 白雪峰, 何文军, 范立勇, 王建, 姜文亚, 柳庄小雪, 陈宁生. 页岩油资源评价方法、参数标准及典型评价实例[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2022, 27(5): 27-41.
[3]	邵晓州, 王苗苗, 齐亚林, 赵红格, 张晓磊, 孙勃, 刘永涛. 鄂尔多斯盆地盐池地区中生界断裂特征及其石油地质意义[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2022, 27(5): 83-95.
[4]	周进高, 张涛, 于洲, 吴东旭, 李程善, 丁振纯, 李维岭, 刘雨昕, 尹陈. 鄂尔多斯盆地奥陶系马家沟组四段沉积期岩相古地理及其控储效应[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2022, 27(4): 61-74.
[5]	孙建博, 郝世彦, 赵谦平, 罗腾跃, 姜磊, 高潮, 郭超, 尹锦涛, 刘刚, 徐杰. 延安地区二叠系山西组1段页岩气储层特征及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2022, 27(3): 110-120.
[6]	付金华, 刘新社, 魏柳斌, 任军峰, 古永红, 王前平, 师平平. 鄂尔多斯盆地奥陶系盐下马家沟组四段天然气勘探突破及意义[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2022, 27(2): 47-58.
[7]	张春林, 张嘉琪, 宋泽章, 姜福杰, 范立勇, 裴煜. 鄂尔多斯盆地东部二叠系山西组煤系气成藏地质条件与资源潜力预测[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(6): 110-124.
[8]	任军峰, 刘新社, 喻建, 魏柳斌, 王前平. 鄂尔多斯盆地中东部奥陶系盐下天然气成藏特征及勘探方向[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(6): 125-140.
[9]	付金华, 刘显阳, 李士祥, 郭芪恒, 周新平, 杨伟伟. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组长7段页岩油勘探发现与资源潜力[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(5): 1-11.
[10]	付金华, 董国栋, 周新平, 惠潇, 淡卫东, 范立勇, 王永刚, 张海涛, 古永红, 周国晓. 鄂尔多斯盆地油气地质研究进展与勘探技术[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(3): 19-40.
[11]	米立军, 朱光辉. 鄂尔多斯盆地东北缘临兴—神府致密气田成藏地质特征及勘探突破[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(3): 53-67.
[12]	齐荣, 何发岐, 王付斌, 贾会冲, 王巍. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部长探1井上古生界勘探突破及意义[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(3): 68-78.
[13]	孟卫工, 李晓光, 吴炳伟, 宫振超, 董德胜, 刘媛媛, 咸秀明. 鄂尔多斯盆地宁古3井太原组含铝岩系天然气成藏特征及地质意义[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(3): 79-87.
[14]	付锁堂, 付金华, 席胜利, 黄正良. 鄂尔多斯盆地奥陶系海相页岩气地质特征及勘探前景[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(2): 33-44.
[15]	何发岐, 王付斌, 张威, 安川, 齐荣, 马超, 陈英毅, 李春堂, 范玲玲, 归平军. 鄂尔多斯盆地北缘勘探思路转变与天然气领域重大突破[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(6): 39-49.