中国石油勘探 ›› 2025, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 36-46.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2025.03.003

• 勘探管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

国际石油公司风险勘探项目决策管理机制研究与启示

屈珺雅,李志,杨紫,侯平,王兆明,李富恒,许海龙,康海亮,商斐   

  1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院
  • 出版日期:2025-05-15 发布日期:2025-05-15
  • 作者简介:屈珺雅(1997-),女,北京人,硕士,2021年毕业于外交学院,工程师,现主要从事海外油气勘探战略规划与资产优化方面的工作。地址:北京市海淀区学院路20号中国石油勘探开发研究院,邮政编码:100083。
  • 基金资助:
    中国石油天然气股份公司科技项目“低碳背景下油气勘探资产技术经济商务一体化评价技术研究”(2023ZZ07-05)。

Research and enlightenment on decision management mechanism of risk exploration projects of international oil companies

Qu Junya, Li Zhi, Yang Zi, Hou Ping, Wang Zhaoming, Li Fuheng, Xu Hailong, Kang Hailiang, Shang Fei   

  1. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development
  • Online:2025-05-15 Published:2025-05-15

摘要: 为突破中国石油企业海外风险勘探面临的优质资产获取难、存量资产发展受限等瓶颈,提升国际竞争力,系统剖析国际领先石油公司风险勘探决策机制。通过专家访谈、咨询调研等方式获取核心资料,选取埃克森美孚、埃尼、壳牌、艾奎诺、道达尔能源、bp6家具有行业代表性的国际石油公司,并重点解剖艾奎诺、埃尼、壳牌3家战略平衡型企业的决策管理体系。研究表明,国际石油公司构建了四阶段标准化决策流程(初步评估与筛选、深度研究、实施方案研究和执行),并形成三大核心机制:依托专业团队分工体系实现“勘探新项目团队—勘探技术团队—管理团队—质控团队”全流程支撑;通过战略导向型投资组合优化平衡风险与收益;建立技术协同创新机制,整合高性能计算平台与智能决策系统提升决策效率。典型案例研究表明,艾奎诺通过区域整合型组织架构缩短决策链条,埃尼采用“双勘探模式”与“多轨并行”决策实现战略目标,壳牌依托成藏组合分析框架强化勘探目标优选。基于中国石油企业体制机制特点,提出战略—资产组合协同优化、决策流程标准化再造、智能管理平台建设、内控体系完善四维改进路径,为提升我国海外油气勘探决策质量、实现从规模扩张向效益优先转型提供理论依据与实践参考。

关键词: 风险勘探, 决策机制, 国际石油公司, 项目管理, 内控审查

Abstract: To address the challenges faced by Chinese petroleum enterprises in overseas risk exploration, including difficulties in acquiring high-quality assets and limitations in developing existing assets, the study systematically analyzes the risk exploration decision-making mechanisms of leading international oil companies. Core data were collected through expert interviews and consulting research, focusing on six representative international firms, including ExxonMobil, Eni, and Shell, with an in-depth examination of three strategically balanced enterprises. The findings indicate that international oil companies have established a four-stage standardized decision-making process (preliminary assessment, in-depth study, program implementation, and execution) supported by three core mechanisms: (1) a professional team division system integrating exploration new project teams, technical teams, management teams, and quality control teams for full-process support; (2)strategically-oriented portfolio optimization to balance risks and returns; and (3) technology collaborative innovation mechanisms that enhance decision efficiency through high-performance computing platforms and intelligent decision-making systems. Case studies reveal that Equinor shortened decision-making chains via regionally integrated organizational structures, Eni achieved strategic goals through a “dual exploration model” and multi-track parallel decision-making, while Shell optimized exploration targets using its play portfolio analysis framework. Tailored to Chinese enterprises’ institutional characteristics, this research proposes a four-dimensional improvement framework: strategic-asset portfolio synergy optimization, standardized decision-process reengineering, intelligent management platform development, and internal control system enhancement. These recommendations provide theoretical and practical insights for improving overseas oil and gas exploration decision quality in China, facilitating a transition from scale-driven expansion to value-centric operations.

Key words: risk exploration, decision-making mechanism, international oil companies, project management, internal control review

中图分类号: