中国石油勘探 ›› 2006, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (6): 113-119,131.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

Agip公司YHD-1井地层对比的思考与教训

孙镇城,乔子真,张海泉,袁秀君,孙乃达,路艳丽   

  1. 中国石油大学(北京)资源与信息学院;中国石油青海油田公司勘探开发研究院;中国石油青海油田公司勘探开发研究院 北京102249;甘肃省敦煌市736202;北京102249
  • 出版日期:2006-12-15 发布日期:2006-12-15

Reflection and Less on of Strata Comparis on ofWell YHD-1 by Agip Company

Sun Zhencheng,Qiao Zizhen,Zhang Haiquan,Yuan Xiujun,Sun Naida and Lu Yanli   

  1. Sun Zhencheng1,Qiao Zizhen2,Zhang Haiquan2,Yuan Xiujun2,Sun Naida1 and Lu Yanli2/ /1 Faculty of Resources and Information, China University of Petroleum,Beijing 102249;2 PetroChina Qinghai Oilfield Company,Dunhuang City,Gansu Province 736202
  • Online:2006-12-15 Published:2006-12-15

摘要: 2002年柴达木盆地YHD-1井地层设计与完井地层对比错误的原因,是沿用了1959年盐新深1井和1995年盐14井错误的分层资料。Agip公司完井总结报告认为,已钻达目的层为古近纪始新世—古新世路乐河组沉积,但本文认为尚未钻穿新近纪中新世下油砂山组沉积。两者对井底地层时代判断至少相差26Ma,占新生代65Ma的2/5。在分析了Agip公司对比错误原因的基础上,阐述了沉积构造复杂、多物源的柴达木盆地新生代地层对比,应采用综合对比方法,尤其是地震地层学与生物地层学结合渗透的方法。

关键词: 探井设计, 地层对比, 地震地层, 生物地层, 柴达木盆地

Abstract: T he mistake of strata comparison between designed boundary and the real boundary by well completion of wellYHD-1 in 2002 in Qaidam Ba sin was made, its reason would be the result of continuing to use the wrong data of stra ta division from well Yanshen-1(1959) and well Yan-14(1995). Agip's summary report of well completion said tha t the aim bed drilled would be Pa leocene-Eocene Lulehe Forma tion, but the authors keep opposed opinion tha t the a bov e boundary is still drilled into Miocene Xiayoushasha n Forma tion. T he a ge value of stratum a t well bottom estimated by both parties ha s la rger difference, which is at lea st the discrepancy of 26Ma, accounting for second fifth of Cenozoic era(65Ma ).On the basis of analysis on the cause of false comparison byAgip Company, it sets forth that the comparison of Cenozoic strata of Qa idam Ba sin, which fea ture in complex sedimentary structure and multiple material sources, should be adopted comprehensive correla tion method, especially integrating seismic stratigra phy with biological stra tigraphy method.

Key words: design of exploration well, stratum comparison, seismic strata, biologica l strata, Qaidam Ba sin

中图分类号: