中国石油勘探 ›› 2016, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (5): 62-69.

• 石油地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

济阳坳陷沾化凹陷沙四上亚段灰质滩坝储层评价

孙耀庭1,2,刘雅利2,巩建强2,孟涛2,李辉2   

  1. 1中国石油大学(华东)地球科学与技术学院
    2中国石化胜利油田分公司勘探开发研究院
  • 出版日期:2016-09-12 发布日期:2016-09-12
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项“济阳坳陷油气富集机制与增储领域”(2011ZX05006-003);中国石化重点科技项目“胜利滩海北西向构造带古近系油气成藏规律”(P13018)。

Evaluation on limy beach-bar reservoirs in the upper part of the fourth member of Shahejie Formation in Zhanhua sag, Jiyang depression

Sun Yaoting1,2,Liu Yali2,Gong Jianqiang2,Meng Tao2,Li Hui2   

  1. 1 School of Geosciences and Technology, China University of Petroleum
    2 Exploration and Development Research Institute, Sinopec Shengli Oilfield Company
  • Online:2016-09-12 Published:2016-09-12

摘要: 济阳坳陷沾化凹陷南部缓坡带沙四上亚段发育灰质滩坝,该类储层与物源和水动力条件关系密切,其位置和规模受提供物源的扇体大小和规模影响,造成储层非均质性强,储集空间复杂,储层评价难度大。分别采用试油资料分析法、主因素综合定量评价法、岩石物理相分析法(流动分层指标法)和铸体薄片压汞分析法对灰质滩坝储层进行评价划分,结果表明主因素综合定量评价法和岩石物理相分析法对灰质滩坝储层评价较为适合,但是这两种方法都存在应用缺陷;在准确分析沉积背景基础上,采用主因素综合定量评价和岩石物理相分析结合的方法对灰质滩坝储层进行分析可以规避各自方法的缺点,评价结果更准确实用。依据此方法将沾化凹陷沙四上亚段灰质滩坝储层划分为4类,其中,Ⅰ类和Ⅱ类储层主要为河口坝和河口滩的生物灰岩、灰质细砂岩和灰质粉砂岩,储层条件较好;Ⅲ类和Ⅳ类储层以灰质粉砂岩和泥质粉砂岩沉积为主,储集性能较差。

关键词: 灰质滩坝, 储层评价, 主因素定量评价, 流动分层指标, 沙四上亚段, 济阳坳陷, 沾化凹陷

Abstract: Limy beach-bar reservoirs are developed in the upper part of the fourth member of the Shahejie Formation (the upper Es4) on the southern gentle slope of the Zhanhua sag, the Jiyang depression. Such reservoirs are closely associated with the provenance and hydrodynamic conditions, and their locations and sizes are affected by the sizes and scales of the fans which provide the provenance, resulting in strong reservoir heterogeneity and complex reservoir space. It is difficult to evaluate these reservoirs. In this paper, four methods (i.e. testing data analysis, comprehensive major element quantification, petrophysical facies analysis and mercury intrusion in casting thin sections) were utilized to evaluate and classify the limy beach-bar reservoirs. The results show that the comprehensive major element quantification method and the petrophysical facies analysis method (or the flow zone indicator method) are more suitable for evaluating the limy beach-bar reservoirs, whereas with defects in application. On the basis of accurate analysis of depositional settings, the comprehensive major element quantification method and the petrophysical facies analysis method could be combined to analyze the limy beach-bar reservoirs, in order to avoid the defects and thereby provide more accurate and practical results. Thus the limy beach-bar reservoirs in the upper Es4 of Zhanhua sag are divided into four types (I, II, III and IV). Type I and Type II reservoirs are biolithite, limy fine sandstone and limy siltstone of mouth bar and estuary shoal, with better reservoir conditions. Type III and Type IV reservoirs are mainly limy siltstone and muddy siltstone, with poor reservoir properties.

Key words: limy beach-bar, reservoir evaluation, major element quantification, flow zone indicator (FZI), upper Es4, the Jiyang depression, the Zhanhua sag