西湖凹陷中央反转带花港组构造—成岩控储机制研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2025.06.010

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 西湖凹陷中央反转带花港组是东海盆地近年来油气勘探的重要目标，但受多期构造活动与成岩作用影响，储层非均质性强，优质储层成因尚不明确。本文以“B”构造为例，综合岩心、矿物组分、扫描电镜、高压压汞及成像测井数据，系统分析储层应力分布、裂缝发育特征及构造—成岩控储机制。研究区构造应力呈明显三段式分带：浅层为张应力主控，发育规则裂缝；中层应力扰动强烈，裂缝走向弥散；深层以剪压应力为主，裂缝集中且倾角大。不同构造部位（断裂核部、破碎带、围岩区）在应力集中、裂缝导通与成岩流体活动方面存在显著差异。综合构造应力及成岩作用的影响，将花港组储层划分为6类构造—成岩相，并明确了其平面展布特征。各类成岩相在断裂核部、破碎带与围岩区之间空间交替分布，其中优质储层多发育于裂缝导通性强、成岩体系开放的强溶蚀相区。总体而言，研究区储层非均质性源于构造应力、裂缝系统与成岩作用的多尺度耦合，构造—成岩相揭示了“应力主导—流体驱动—相带分异”的控储模式。研究结果为走滑断裂带优质储层预测与分带评价提供了地质依据。

关键词: 致密砂岩；构造—成岩相；走滑断裂；花港组；西湖凹陷

Abstract: The Huagang Formation in the central inversion belt of the Xihu Sag has been an important target for oil and gas exploration in the East China Sea Basin in recent years. However, due to the influence of multiphase tectonic activity and diagenesis, the reservoirs exhibit strong heterogeneity, and the genesis of high-quality reservoirs remains unclear. Taking Structure “B” as an example, this study integrates core observations, mineral composition analysis, scanning electron microscopy, high-pressure mercury intrusion, and imaging logging data to systematically analyze reservoir stress distribution, fracture development characteristics, and the tectono-diagenetic reservoir-controlling mechanism. The tectonic stress in the study area displays a distinct three-segment zonation: the shallow zone is dominated by extensional stress with regularly oriented fractures; the middle zone is characterized by intense stress disturbance and diffuse fracture orientations; and the deep zone is governed by compressive–shear stress, with concentrated fractures of large dip angles. Different structural positions (fault core, damage zone, and host rock) show significant differences in stress concentration, fracture connectivity, and diagenetic fluid activity. Considering the combined effects of tectonic stress and diagenesis, the Huagang Formation reservoirs are classified into six types of tectono-diagenetic facies, and their planar distribution characteristics are clarified. These facies alternate spatially among the fault core, damage zone, and host rock, with high-quality reservoirs predominantly developed in strongly dissolved facies zones characterized by high fracture connectivity and an open diagenetic system. Overall, reservoir heterogeneity in the study area results from the multi-scale coupling of tectonic stress, fracture systems, and diagenetic processes, and the tectono-diagenetic facies reveal a “stress-dominated – fluid-driven – facies belt differentiation” reservoircontrolling model. The results provide a geological basis for high-quality reservoir prediction and zonal evaluation in strike-slip fault zones.

Key words: Tight sandstone; Tectono-diagenetic facies; Strike-slip fault; Huagang Formation; Xihu Sag

中图分类号:

TE122.3

田安琦,刘成林,付金华,黄导武,刘创新,霍宏亮. 西湖凹陷中央反转带花港组构造—成岩控储机制研究[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2025, 30(6): 134-152.

Tian Anqi, Liu Chenglin,Fu Jinhua,Huang Daowu,Liu Chuangxin,Huo Hongliang. Tectono-diagenetic reservoir-controlling mechanisms of the Huagang Formation in the central inversion belt, Xihu Sag[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2025, 30(6): 134-152.

参考文献

[1] 于兴河，郑浚茂，宋立衡，等.构造、沉积与成岩综合一体化模式的建立：以松南梨树地区后五家户气田为例[J].沉积学报，1997, 15(3):8-13.
Yu Xinghe, Zheng Junmao, Song Liheng, et al. The establishment of intrgrated model on structure, deposition and diagenesis [J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1997,15(3):8-13.
[2] 钟大康，朱筱敏，王红军.中国深层优质碎屑岩储层特征与形成机理分析[J].中国科学D辑，2008,35(增刊1):11-18.
Zhong Dakang, Zhu Xiaomin, Wang Hongjun. Characteristics and formation mechanisms of high-quality deep clastic reservoirs in China [J]. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 2008,35(S1):11-18.
[3] 郭红验，刘艺妮，沈安江，等.川中蓬莱气区灯四段沉积微相及其对储层的控制作用[J].地质科学，2025,60(3):813-824.
Guo Hongyan, Liu Yini, Shen Anjiang, et al. Sedimentary microfacies of the fourth member of Dengying Formation in Penglai gas area of central Sichuan and its control on reservoir [J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2025,60(3):813-824.
[4] 王捷，王千军，郑胜，等.准噶尔盆地沙湾凹陷三叠系超深层碎屑岩储层特征及主控因素：以征10井区克拉玛依组为例[J].油气地质与采收率，2024,31(4):164-173.
Wang Jie, Wang Qianjun, Zheng Sheng, et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of Triassic ultra-deep clastic rock reservoirs in Shawan Sag, Junggar Basin：a case study of Karamay Formation in Well Zheng10 area [J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2024,31(4):164-173.
[5] Feng D H, Liu C L, Feng X L, et al. Movable fluid evaluation of tight sandstone reservoirs in lacustrine delta front setting: occurrence characteristics, multiple control factors, and prediction model [J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2023, 155:106393.
[6] Cui C Z, Xi L K, Cao C Y, et al. Feldspar dissolution controlled by coal-measure fluids and the impacts on pore structure of tight sandstone reservoirs: the case of the Jurassic Badaowan Formation in the Junggar Basin, Northwestern China [J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2025,178.
[7] 赵爽，赵迪，张玲，等.川西坳陷须家河组二段深埋致密砂岩储层溶蚀作用特征与成因[J/OL].矿物岩石：1-24. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/51.1143.TD.20250414.0932.002.
Zhao Shuang, Zhao Di, Zhang Ling, et al. Characteristics and genesis of dissolution in the second member of the Xujiahe Formation， western Sichuan Depression [J/OL]. Mineralogy and Petrology: 1-24. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/51.1143.TD.20250414.0932.002.
[8] Wu Y, Fu G. Movable fluid distribution and controlling factors in Upper Paleozoic tight sandstone reservoirs: insights from the Shenmu-Mizhi area [J]. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 2025,15:82.
[9] 邵鑫笛，宋岩，姜振学，等.成岩演化对陆相致密砂岩储层可动性差异的控制机理及演化模式：以松辽盆地北部下白垩统扶余油层为例[J].石油科学通报, 2025,10(1):16-34.
Shao Xindi, Song Yan, Jiang Zhenxue, et al. The control mechanism and evolution model of diagenesis on the mobility difference of continental tight sandstone reservoirs: taking Fuyu oil layer of Lower Cretaceous in the northern Songliao Basin as an example [J]. Petroleum Science Bulletin, 2025,10(1):16-34.
[10] 李莉妃，任启强，杨田，等.多级构型界面下致密砂岩储层构造裂缝发育特征：以川西坳陷须家河组二段为例[J].石油实验地质，2024, 46(4):722-734.
Li Lifei, Ren Qiqiang, Yang Tian, et al. Development characteristics of structural fractures in tight sandstone reservoirs under multi-level configuration interfaces:a case study of second member of Xujiahe Formation in Western Sichuan Depression [J]. Petroleum Geology ＆ Experiment, 2024,46(4):722-734.
[11] Yin S, Tian T, Wu Z. Developmental characteristics and distribution law of fractures in a tight sandstone reservoir in a low‐?amplitude tectonic zone, eastern Ordos Basin, China [J]. Geological Journal, 2020,55:1546-1562.
[12] 张惠良，张荣虎，杨海军，等.超深层裂缝—孔隙型致密砂岩储集层表征与评价：以库车前陆盆地克拉苏构造带白垩系巴什基奇克组为例[J].石油勘探与开发，2014,41(2):158-167.
Zhang Huiliang, Zhang Ronghu, Yang Haijun, et al. Characterization and evaluation of ultra-deep fracture-pore tight sandstone reservoirs: a case study of Cretaceous Bashijiqike Formation in Kelasu tectonic zone in Kuqa foreland basin, Tarim, NW China [J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014,41(2):158-167.
[13] Tian A Q, Liu C L, Liu C X, et al. Origin of the Cenozoic faults in the“B”structure of the central inversion belt in the northern part of the Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin [J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2025,178:107429.
[14] 孟玉净，骆杨，赵彦超，等.泾河油田走滑断裂带长8—长6段致密砂岩构造成岩作用及控储分析[J].地质科技通报，2025,44(1):74-89.
Meng Yujing, Luo Yang, Zhao Yanchao, et al. Structural diagenesis and reservoir control analysis of tight sandstone in the strike-slip fault zones of the Chang 8 to Chang 6 Members in the Jinghe Oilfield [J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2025,44(1):74-89.
[15] Wei G Q, Wang K, Zhang R H, et al. Structural diagenesis and high-quality reservoir prediction of tight sandstones: a case study of the Jurassic Ahe Formation of the Dibei gas reservoir, Kuqa depression, Tarim basin, NW China [J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2022,239:314-326.
[16] 王珂，张荣虎，唐永，等.库车坳陷北部构造带侏罗系阿合组构造成岩作用与储层预测[J].石油学报，2022,43(7):925-940.
Wang Ke, Zhang Ronghu, Tang Yong, et al. Structural diagenesis and reservoir prediction of Lower Jurassic Ahe Formation in the northern structural belt of Kuqa depression [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022,43(7):925-940.
[17] 于淼，高岗，马强，等.火山灰—咸化湖相混源富有机质细粒岩沉积特征与成岩相：以三塘湖盆地条湖—马朗凹陷二叠系芦草沟组二段为例[J].中国石油勘探，2025,30(2):79-98.
Yu Miao, Gao Gang, Ma Qiang, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and diagenetic phases of volcanic ash–?saline lacustrine mixed-source organic-rich fine-grained rocks: a case study of the second member of the Permian Luocaogou Formation in the Tiaohu and Malang Sags, Santanghu Basin [J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2025,30(2):79-98.
[18] 袁静，俞国鼎，钟剑辉，等.构造成岩作用研究现状及展望[J].沉积学报，2018,36(6):1177-1189.
Yuan Jing, Yu Guoding, Zhong Jianhui, et al. An overview of structural diagenesis [J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2018, 36(6):1177-1189.
[19] 曾联波，朱如凯，高志勇，等.构造成岩作用及其油气地质意义[J]. 石油科学通报，2016,1(2):191-197.
Zeng Lianbo, Zhu Rukai, Gao Zhiyong, et al. Structural diagenesis and its petroleum geological significance [J]. Petroleum Science Bulletin, 2016,1(2):191-197.
[20] 曾联波，宋逸辰，韩俊，等.塔里木盆地构造流体作用对超深层断控碳酸盐岩缝洞型储层的控制[J].石油勘探与开发，2025,52(1): 128-139.
Zeng Lianbo, Song Yichen, Han Jun, et al. Control of structure and fluid on ultra-deep fault-controlled carbonate fracture-vug reservoirs in Tarim Basin, NW China [J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2025,52(1):128-139.
[21] Shou J, Shen Y, Zhang H, et al. Characteristics of Mesozoic-Cenozoic tectonic diagenesis in the Kuqa area of the Tarim Basin, China [J]. Petroleum Science, 2009,6:366-375.
[22] 何庆斌，张继红.松辽盆地南部大安地区姚一段特低渗砂岩成岩作用与成岩相[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版)，2022,49(6):674-686.
He Qingbin, Zhang Jihong. Diagenesis and diagenetic facies of ultra-low permeability sandstone in the first member of Yaojia Formation in Da’an area, South Songliao Basin, China [J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2022,49(6):674-686.
[23] 张玉晔，高建武，赵靖舟，等.鄂尔多斯盆地东南部长6油层组致密砂岩成岩作用及其孔隙度定量恢复[J].岩性油气藏，2021,33(6): 29-38.
Zhang Yuye, Gao Jianwu, Zhao Jingzhou, et al. Diagenesis and pore evolution of Chang 6 tight sandstone reservoir in southeastern Ordos Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(6):29-38.
[24] 蔡全升，胡明毅.西湖凹陷黄岩构造带花港组砂岩储层成岩作用研究[J]. 科学技术与工程，2013,13(30):9012-9017.
Cai Quansheng, Hu Mingyi. Diagenesis of Sandstone of Huagang Formation in Huangyan Tectonic Belt,Xihu Sag [J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2013,13(30):9012-9017.
[25] Lin J, Dong C, Lin C, et al. The impact of tectonic inversion on diagenesis and reservoir quality of the Oligocene fluvial sandstones: the upper Huagang Formation, Xihu Depression, East China Sea Shelf Basin [J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2024,165.
[26] 张迎朝，邹玮，陈忠云，等.东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷中央反转构造带古近系花港组气藏“先汇后聚”机制及地质意义[J].石油与天然气地质，2023,44(5):1256-1269.
Zhang Yingchao, Zou Wei, Chen Zhongyun, et al. The mechanism of“convergence ahead of accumulation”and its geological significance for gas reservoirs in Paleogene Huagang Formation across the central inverted structural zone of Xihu Depression, East China Sea Shelf Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023,44(5):1256-1269.
[27] 王文义，程宏岗，徐淑娟，等.东海盆地西湖凹陷中西部花港组物源方向判别与源区性质分析[J].中国海上油气，2023,35(2):33-43.
Wang Wenyi, Cheng Honggang, Xu Shujuan, et al. Provenance indication and source characteristics of Huagang Formation in the central and western Xihu Sag of the East China Sea Basin [J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2023,35(2): 33-43.
[28] 黄鑫，林承焰，黄导武，等.西湖凹陷中央反转带中北部花港组砂岩储层成岩差异演化特征[J].油气地质与采收率，2022,29(2):1-14.
Huang Xin, Lin Chengyan, Huang Daowu, et al. Diagenetic differential evolution of Huagang Formation sandstone reservoir in north-central part of central reversal structural belt in Xihu Sag [J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2022, 29(2):1-14.
[29] 刘创新，高红艳，刘彬彬，等.西湖凹陷中央反转带花港组储层成岩演化南北差异及其影响因素分析[J].地质论评，2024,70(4):1353-1365.
Liu Chuangxin, Gao Hongyan, Liu Binbin, et al. Analysis on the difference of diagenetic evolution and its influencing factors between north and south of Huagang Formation reservoir in central inversion zone of Xihu Sag [J]. Geological Review, 2024,70(4):1353-1365.
[30] 高梦天，陆永潮，杜学斌，等.致密砂岩多因子储层精细分级评价方法：以东海盆地西湖凹陷渐新统花港组上段H3砂组为例[J].石油实验地质，2021,43(6):1097-1106.
Gao Mengtian, Lu Yongchao, Du Xuebin, et al. Multi-factor evaluation for fine grading of tight sandstone reservoirs: a case study from H3 sand group in the upper sectionof Oligocene Huagang Formation, Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin [J]. Petroleum Geology ＆ Experiment, 2021,43(6):1097-1106.
[31] Suo Y, Li S, Yu S, et al. Cenozoic tectonic jumping and implications for hydrocarbon accumulation in basins in the East Asia Continental Margin [J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2014,88(1):28-40.
[32] 徐昉昊，徐国盛，刘勇，等.东海西湖凹陷中央反转构造带古近系花港组致密砂岩储集层控制因素[J].石油勘探与开发，2020,47(1): 98-109.
Xu Fanghao, Xu Guosheng, Liu Yong, et al. Reservoir controlling factors of Paleogene Huagang Formation tight sandstone in the central inversion structural belt, Xihu Sag [J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020,47(1):98-109.
[33] 罗盼，李九生.含煤地层下薄砂体分布预测方法：以东海西湖凹陷PB地区为例[J].地质科技通报，2024,43(6):258-270.
Luo Pan, li Jiusheng. Prediction method of thin sand reservoir with coal bearing: an example from PB area of Xihu Sag at East China Sea [J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2024,43(6):258-270.
[34] 赵晓明，代茂林，刘舒，等.西湖凹陷中南部花港组下段储层成岩—孔隙演化[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版)，2024,46(1):21-34.
Zhao Xiaoming, Dai Maolin, Liu Shu, et al. Diagenesis and pore evolution of the lower member reservoirs of Huagang Formation in the south-central Xihu Sag [J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2024,46(1):21-34.
[35] Zhang G, Li S, Suo Y, et al. Cenozoic positive inversion tectonics and its migration in the East China Sea Shelf Basin [J]. Geological Journal, 2016,51:176-187.
[36] 赵志刚，王鹏，祁鹏，等.东海盆地形成的区域地质背景与构造演化特征[J].地球科学，2016,41(3):546-554.
Zhao Zhigang, Wang Peng, Qi Peng, et al. Regional background and tectonic evolution of east China Sea Basin [J]. Earth Science, 2016,41(3):546-554.
[37] 周心怀，徐国盛，崔恒远，等.东海西湖凹陷中央反转构造带古近系花港组致密砂岩储集层裂缝发育特征与油气成藏关系[J].石油勘探与开发，2020,47(3):462-475.
Zhou Xinhui, Xu Guosheng, Cui Hengyuan, et al. Fracture development and hydrocarbon accumulation in tight sandstone reservoirs of the Paleogene Huagang Formation in the central reversal tectonic belt of the Xihu Sag, East China Sea [J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020,47(3):462-475.
[38] Dai L, Li S, Lou D, et al. Numerical modeling of Late Miocene tectonic inversion in the Xihu Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin, China [J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2014, 86:25-37.
[39] 刘金水，邹玮，李宁，等.“储保耦合”控藏机制与西湖凹陷大中型油气田勘探实践[J].中国海上油气，2019,31(3):11-19.
Liu Jinshui, Zou Wei, Li Ning, et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation control mechanism of reservoir-conservation coupling and its large and medium-sized fields exploration practice in Xihu sag, East China Sea basin [J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2019,31(3):11-19.
[40] 张宙，何新建，唐贤君，等.东海盆地西湖凹陷构造圈闭特征及其油气藏类型[J].海洋地质前沿，2022,38(3):27-35.
Zhang Zhou, He Xinjian, Tang Xianjun, et al. Structural trap characteristics and reservoir types in Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin [J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2022,38(3):27-35.
[41] Wang W, Lin C, Zhang X. The joint controls of tectonism, sedimentation and diagenesis on reservoir quality in the East China Sea Basin [J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2024, 165: 106890.
[42] Yang Y Z, Huang Z L, Pan Y S, et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation process and reservoir-forming models of Structure A in the central inversion tectonic belt of the Xihu Depression, East China Sea Basin [J]. Natural Gas Industry B, 2024,11(4): 341-356.
[43] Yan B, Yuan Q H, Li N, et al. Differences in hydrocarbon accumulation and controlling factors of slope belt in graben basin: a case study of Pinghu Slope Belt in the Xihu Sag of the East China Sea Shelf Basin [J]. Petroleum Science, 2024, 21(5):2901-2926.
[44] 刘一鸣.中国近海新生代盆地构造差异性及成因机制探讨[D].青岛：中国石油大学(华东)，2021.
Liu Yiming. Structural variations and genetic mechanism of the Cenozoic Basins offshore China [D]. Qingdao: China University of Petroleum (East China), 2021.
[45] 张晓庆，廖计华，李峰，等.东海盆地反转背斜断裂特征及其控藏作用：以西湖凹陷G构造为例[J].天然气地球科学，2023,34(12):2136-2150.
Zhang Xiaoqing, Liao Jihua, Li Feng, et al. The fault system characteristics and its control on reservoir formation of reverse anticline in the East China Sea Basin: an example from structure G in the Xihu Sag [J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2023, 34(12):2136-2150.
[46] 蒋一鸣，邹玮，刘金水，等. 东海西湖凹陷中新世末反转背斜构造成因机制：来自基底结构差异的新认识[J].地球科学，2020,45(3): 968-979.
Jiang Yiming, Zou Wei, Liu Jinshui, et al. Genetic mechanism of inversion anticline structure at the End of Miocene in Xihu Sag, East China Sea: a new understanding of basement Structure difference [J]. Earth Science, 2020,45(3):968-979.
[47] Yu L, Yu Y, Jiang Y, et al. Development of arcuate faults and controls on hydrocarbon accumulation in the Tiantai Slope, Xihu Depression, East China Sea Basin [J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2024,276:106362.
[48] 张绍亮，张建培，唐贤君，等.东海西湖凹陷断裂系统几何学特征及其成因机制[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质，2014,34(1):87-94.
Zhang Shaoliang, Zhang Jianpei, Tang Xianjun, et al. Geometry characteristic of the fault system in Xihu Sag in East China Sea and its formation mechanism [J]. Marine Geology ＆ Quaternary Geology, 2014,34(1):87-94.
[49] 林婉媚，邓庆杰，胡明毅，等.西湖凹陷花港组上段砂岩成岩—成储匹配机理研究[J/OL].现代地质，1-14. https://doi.org/10.19657/j. geoscience.1000-8527.2025.028.
Lin Wanmei, Deng Qingjie, Hu Mingyi, et al. Study on the diagenetic reservoir matching mechanism of sandstone in the Upper Member of Huagang Formation, Xihu Depression [J/OL]. Geoscience, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.19657/j.geoscience.1000-8527.2025.028.
[50] 邹玮，余一欣，刘金水，等.东海盆地西湖凹陷中央反转构造带发育主控因素及宁波背斜形成过程[J].石油学报，2021,42(2):176-185.
Zou Wei, Yu Yixin, Liu Jinshui, et al. Main controlling factors of the central inversional structure belt and the development of Ningbo anticline in Xihu sag,East China Sea Basin [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021,42(2):176-185.
[51] 王亦然，徐国盛，刘勇，等.西湖凹陷西次凹花港组致密砂岩储层成岩环境与孔隙演化[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版)，2020, 47(1):35-49.
Wang Yiran, Xu Guosheng, Liu Yong, et al. Diagenetic environment and pore evolution of Huagang Formation compact sandstone reservoirs in the western sub-depression of Xihu Depression, East China Sea [J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2020,47(1):35-49.
[52] Guo Z, Liu C, Tian J. Structural characteristics and main controlling factors of inversion structures in Xihu Depression in Donghai Basin [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2015,22(3):59-67.
[53] 胡望水，柴浩栋，李瑞升，等.平衡剖面技术对东海西湖凹陷正反转构造及其成藏控制的研究[J].特种油气藏，2010,17(1):15-19,121.
Hu Wangshui, Chai Haodong, Li Ruisheng, et al. Application of balanced section technique to the study of positive inversion structure and hydrocarbon accumulation control in Xihu Depression of East China Sea [J]. Special Oil ＆ Gas Reservoirs, 2010,17(1):15-19,121.
[54] Beard D C, Weyl P K. Influence of texture on porosity and permeability of unconsolidated sand [J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1973, 57(2):349-369.
[55] 贾承造，张荣虎，魏国齐，等.天山陆内冲断带构造动力控储效应与超深层规模储层[J].石油学报，2023,44(8):1191-1205.
Jia Chengzao, Zhang Ronghu, Wei Guoqi, et al. T Reservoir-controlling effects of tectonic dynamics and ultra-deep reservoirs in Tianshan intracontinental thrust belt [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023,44(8):1191-1205.
[56] Wei G Q, Wang K, Zhang R H, et al. Structural diagenesis and high-quality reservoir prediction of tight sandstones: a case study of the Jurassic Ahe Formation of the Dibei gas reservoir, Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin, NW China [J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2022,239.
[57] Yuan G H, Cao Y C, Gluyas J, et al. Reactive transport modeling of coupled feldspar dissolution and secondary mineral precipitation and its implication for diagenetic interaction in sandstones [J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2017,207: 59-75.
[58] Souza D R R, César F S D A, Centurion V C. Evolution of deformation bands, insights from structural diagenesis [J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 2021,143:104252.
[59] Busch B, Hilgers C, Gronen L, et al. Cementation and structural diagenesis of fluvio-aeolian Rotliegend sandstones, northern England [J]. Journal of the Geological Society, 2017, 174(5):881-892.
[60] Wu G, Xie E, Zhang Y, et al. Structural diagenesis in carbonate rocks as identified in fault damage zones in the northern Tarim Basin, NW China [J]. Minerals, 2019,9(6):344.
[61] Vandeginste V, Swennen R, Allaeys M, et al. Challenges of structural diagenesis in foreland fold-and-thrust belts: A case study on paleofluid flow in the Canadian Rocky Mountains west of Calgary [J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2012, 35(1)235-251.
[62] Yu J X, Shi K B, Wang Q Q, et al. Structural diagenesis of deep carbonate rocks controlled by intra‐?cratonic strike-slip faulting: an example in the Shunbei area of the Tarim Basin, NW China [J]. Basin Research, 2022,34(5):2229-2250.
[63] Lai J, Li D, Ai Y, et al. Structural diagenesis in ultra-deep tight sandstones in the Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin, China [J]. Solid Earth, 2022,13(6):975-993.
[64] 邬光辉，张韬，朱永峰，等.碳酸盐岩断裂破碎带结构、分布与发育机制[J].地质科学，2020,55(1):68-80.
Wu Guanghui, Zhang Tao, Zhu Yongfeng, et al. The architecture,distribution and growth of carbonate fault damage zone [J]. Chinese Journal of Geology (Scientia Geologica Sinica), 2020,55(1):68-80.
[65] 王乐闻，刘舒，杨彩虹，等.西湖凹陷Y构造带花港组储层特征及物性影响因素分析[J].海洋石油，2016,36(4):27-32,100.
Wang Lewen, Liu Shu, Yang Caihong, et al. Reservoir characteristics and influence factors of Huagang Formation in Y Structure, Xihu Sag [J]. Offshore Oil, 2016,36(4):27-32,100.
[66] 徐国盛，徐芳艮，袁海锋，等.西湖凹陷中央反转构造带花港组致密砂岩储层成岩环境演变与孔隙演化[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版)，2016,43(4):385-395.
Xu Guosheng, Xu Fanggen, Yuan Haifeng, et al. Diagenetic environment evolution and pore evolution of tight sandstone reservoirs in Huagang Formation, central inversion structural belt of Xihu Sag [J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2016,43(4):385-395.
[67] 梁建设，王琪，郝乐伟，等.西湖凹陷渐新统花港组储层砂岩成岩环境演化探讨[J].天然气地球科学，2012,23(4):673-680.
Liang Jianshe, Wang Qi, Hao Lewei, et al. Evolution of diagenetic environments for Oligocene Huagang Formation sandstone in Xihu Sag [J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2012,23(4): 673-680.
[68] 付勋勋，范立勇，裴文超，等.鄂尔多斯盆地太原组致密灰岩储层构造缝地质意义、预测及应用[J].中国岩溶，2025,44(2):382-397.
Fu Xunxun, Fan Liyong, Pei Wenchao, et al. Geological significance, prediction， and application of structural fractures in tight limestone reservoirs of the Taiyuan Formation in Ordos Basin [J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2025,44(2):382-397.
[69] He D, Hou D, Zhang P, et al. Reservoir characteristics in the LW3-1 structure in the deepwater area of the Baiyun Sag, South China Sea [J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2016, 9:251(4).