Progress of key technologies for oil and gas resource assessment of Sinopec during the 13th Five-Year Plan period and development direction

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2022.03.003

Abstract

Abstract: Resource assessment is the basis for decision-making in petroleum exploration, and it is one of the important work for formulating energy development strategy and industry development plan of the government. The difficulties and characteristics of Sinopec’s new round of resource assessment against the new situations are analyzed, and the overall idea and technical framework of resource assessment during the 13^th Five-Year Plan period are demonstrated in detail. As a result, a series of oil and gas resource assessment technologies and software platforms with Sinopec’s characteristics are innovatively developed, including a complete source rock evolution simulation technology from hydrocarbon generation to expulsion and retention, “conventional-unconventional” integrated TSM basin modeling technology, shale oil and gas resources classification and evaluation technology based on maturity and pressure coefficient, “geology-economy-ecology” integrated oil and gas resource assessment technology. Furthermore, on the basis of resource assessment during the 13^th Five-Year Plan period, the key research directions of resource assessment in the future are proposed as follows: (1) 3D hydrocarbon migration and accumulation simulation technology of complex geological conditions and special types of oil and gas reservoirs; (2) Zoning schemes for various types of basins and corresponding resource calculation and splitting technology; (3) Integrated oil and gas resource assessment system based on big data and intelligent platform; (4) Comprehensive evaluation technology of oil and gas co-associated resources.

CLC Number:

TE122

Song Zhenxiang, Zhou Zhuoming, Xu Xuhui, Wang Baohua, Li Hao, Ma Zhongliang, Chen Feiran. Progress of key technologies for oil and gas resource assessment of Sinopec during the 13^th Five-Year Plan period and development direction[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2022, 27(3): 27-37.

References

[1] 宋振响，陆建林，周卓明，等.常规油气资源评价方法研究进展与发展方向[J].中国石油勘探，2017,22(3):21-31.
Song Zhenxiang, Lu Jianlin, Zhou Zhuoming, et al. Research progress and future development of assessment methods for conventional hydrocarbon resources[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2017,22(3):21-31.
[2] 何海清，范土芝，郭绪杰，等.中国石油“十三五”油气勘探重大成果与“十四五”发展战略[J].中国石油勘探，2021,26(1):17-30.
He Haiqing, Fan Tuzhi, Guo Xujie, et al. Major achievements in oil and gas exploration of PetroChina during the 13th Five-Year Plan period and its development strategy for the 14th Five-Year Plan[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2021,26(1): 17-30.
[3] 蔡勋育，刘金连，张宇，等.中国石化“十三五”油气勘探进展与“十四五”前景展望[J].中国石油勘探，2021,26(1):31-42.
Cai Xunyu, Liu Jinlian, Zhang Yu, et al. Oil and gas exploration progress of Sinopec during the 13th Five-Year Plan period and prospect forecast for the 14th Five-Year Plan[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2021,26(1):31-42.
[4] 谢玉洪.中国海油“十三五”油气勘探重大成果与“十四五”前景展望[J].中国石油勘探，2021,26(1):43-54.
Xie Yuhong. Major achievements in oil and gas exploration of CNOOC in the 13th Five-Year Plan period and prospects in the 14th Five-Year Plan period[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2021,26(1):43-54.
[5] 王香增.陕西延长石油(集团)有限责任公司油气勘探开发进展与展望[J].中国石油勘探，2018,23(1):36-43.
Wang Xiangzeng. Advances and prospects in oil and gas exploration and development of Shanxi Yanchang Petroleum (Group)Co.，Ltd[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2018,23(1): 36-43.
[6] 王陆新，潘继平，娄钰.近十年中国石油勘探开发回顾与展望[J]. 国际石油经济，2018,26(7):65-71.
Wang Luxin, Pan Jiping, Lou Yu. Review and prospect of petroleum exploration and development in China over the past decade[J]. International Petroleum Economics, 2018,26(7):65-71.
[7] 李建忠，吴晓智，郑民，等.第四次油气资源评价方法体系与关键技术[J].中国石油企业，2017(5):30-33.
Li Jianzhong, Wu Xiaozhi, Zheng Min, et al. The fourth oil and gas evaluation method system and key technology[J]. China Petroleum Enterprise, 2017(5):30-33.
[8] 冯建辉，蔡勋育，牟泽辉，等.中国石油化工股份有限公司“十二五”油气勘探进展与“十三五”展望[J].中国石油勘探，2016,21(3):1-13.
Feng Jianhui, Cai Xunyu, Mou Zehui, et al. Oil and gas exploration of China Petroleum and Chemical Corporation during the 12th Five-Year Plan and the prospect for the 13th Five-Year Plan[J].China Petroleum Exploration, 2016,21(3): 1-13.
[9] 魏国齐，王志宏，李剑，等.四川盆地震旦系、寒武系烃源岩特征、资源潜力与勘探方向[J].天然气地球科学，2017,28(1):1-13.
Wei Guoqi, Wang Zhihong, Li Jian, et al. Characteristics of source rocks,resource potential and exploration direction of Sinian and Cambrian in Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017,28(1):1-13.
[10] 漆立新.塔里木盆地顺北超深断溶体油藏特征与启示[J].中国石油勘探，2020,25(1):102-111.
Qi Lixin. Characteristics and inspiration of ultra-deep fault-karst reservoir in the Shunbei area of the Tarim Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020,25(1):102-111.
[11] 王永诗，郝雪峰，胡阳.富油凹陷油气分布有序性与富集差异性：以渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷东营凹陷为例[J].石油勘探与开发，2018, 45(5):785-794.
Wang Yongshi, Hao Xuefeng, Hu Yang. Orderly distribution and differential enrichment of hydrocarbon in oil-rich sags: a case study of Dongying Sag, Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, east China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018,45(5):785-794.
[12] 顾忆，万旸璐，黄继文，等.“大埋深、高压力”条件下塔里木盆地超深层油气勘探前景[J].石油实验地质，2019,41(2):157-164. Gu Yi, Wan Yanglu, Huang Jiwen, et al. Thermal evolution of organic matter hydrocarbon evolution and retardation mode under high pressure ultra-deep formation oil and gas exploration potential source rock Cambrian Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019,41(2):157-164.
[13] 马中良，郑伦举，李志明.烃源岩有限空间温压共控生排烃模拟实验研究[J].沉积学报，2012,30(5):955-963.
Ma Zhongliang, Zheng Lunju, Li Zhiming. Simulation experiment of hydrocarbon generation and expulsion hydrocarbon generation in a limited space pore fluid pressure source rock[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2012,30(5):955-963.
[14] 马晓潇，黎茂稳，蒋启贵，等.陆相页岩含油性的化学动力学定量评价方法[J].油气地质与采收率，2019,26(1):137-152.
Ma Xiaoxiao, Li Maowen, Jiang Qigui, et al. Chemical kinetic model for quantitative evaluation on oil-bearing property of lacustrine shale[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019,26(1):137-152.
[15] 张锦宏.中国石化石油工程技术现状及发展建议[J].石油钻探技术，2019,47(3):9-17.
Zhang Jinhong. Current status and outlook for the development of Sinopec’s petroleum engineering technologies[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2019,47(3):9-17.
[16] 宋振响，徐旭辉，王保华，等.页岩气资源评价方法研究进展与发展方向[J].石油与天然气地质，2020,41(5):1038-1047.
Song Zhenxiang, Xu Xuhui, Wang Baohua, et al. Advances in shale gas resource assessment methods and their future evolvement[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020,41(5):1038-1047.
[17] 胡国艺，张水昌，田华，等.不同母质类型烃源岩排气效率[J].天然气地球科学，2014,25(1):45-52.
Hu Guoyi, Zhang Shuichang, Tian Hua, et al. Gas relative expulsion efficiency of source rocks with different types of kerogen[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2014,25(1):45-52.
[18] 郑伦举，王强，秦建中，等.海相古油藏及可溶有机质再生烃气能力研究[J].石油实验地质，2008,30(4):390-395.
Zheng Lunju, Wang Qiang, Qin Jianzhong, et al. Hydrocarbon- regeneration capability of marine paleo-reservoir and soluble organic matter[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2008, 30(4):390-395.
[19] 李建忠，吴晓智，郑民，等.常规与非常规油气资源评价的总体思路、方法体系与关键技术[J].天然气地球科学，2016,27(9):1557-1565.
Li Jianzhong, Wu Xiaozhi, Zheng Min, et al. General philosophy, method system and key technology of conventional and unconventional oil & gas resource assessment[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016,27(9):1557-1565.
[20] 徐旭辉，朱建辉，江兴歌，等.TSM盆地模拟原理方法与应用[J]. 石油实验地质，2017,39(6):729-737.
Xu Xuhui, Zhu Jianhui, Jiang Xingge, et al. Principle of TSM basin simulation system and its application[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2017,39(6):729-737.
[21] 卢双舫，黄文彪，陈方文，等.页岩油气资源分级评价标准探讨[J]. 石油勘探与开发，2012,39(2):249-256.
Lu Shuangfang, Huang Wenbiao, Chen Fangwen, et al. Classification and evaluation criteria of shale oil and gas resources: discussion and application[J]. Petroleum Exploration and development, 2012,39(2):249-256.
[22] Skvortsov M B, Dakhnova M V, Mozhegova S V, et al. Geochemical methods for prediction and assessment of shale oil resources (case study of the Bazhenov Formation)[J]. Russian Geology and Geophysics, 2017,58(3-4):403-409.
[23] Xiao X M, Wei Q, Gai H F, et al. Main controlling factors and enrichment area evaluation of shale gas of the Lower Paleozoic Marine Strata in South China[J]. Petroleum Science, 2015,12(4):573-586.
[24] 李浩，陆建林，王保华，等.陆相页岩油富集高产关键因素分析[J]. 现代地质，2020,34(4):837-848.
Li Hao, Lu Jianlin, Wang Baohua, et al. Critical controlling factors of enrichment and high-yield of land shale oil[J]. Geoscience, 2020,34(4):837-848.
[25] 徐田武，张洪安，李继东，等.渤海湾盆地东濮凹陷盐湖相成烃成藏特征[J].石油与天然气地质，2019,40(2):248-261.
Xu Tianwu, Zhang Hong’an, Li Jidong, et al. Characters of hydrocarbon generation and accumulation of salt-lake facies in Dongpu Sag，Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(2):248-261.
[26] 胡东风，张汉荣，倪楷，等.四川盆地东南缘海相页岩气保存条件及其主控因素[J]．天然气工业，2014,34(6):17-23．
Hu Dongfeng, Zhang Hanrong, Ni Kai, et al. Main controlling factor gas preservation conditions of marine shales in southeastern margins of the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2014,34(6):17-23．
[27] 宋振响，邱岐，赵琳洁，等.基于存滞系数的页岩气资源评价方法[J]. 天然气工业，2020,40(10):12-19.
Song Zhenxiang, Qiu Qi, Zhao Linjie, et al. A shale gas resource evaluation method based on retention coefficient[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020,40(10):12-19．
[28] 陈斐然，段金宝，张汉荣，等.页岩气“压力系数”分级资源评价方法：以川东南上奥陶统五峰组—下志留统龙马溪组为例[J].石油实验地质，2020,42(3):405-414.
Chen Feiran, Duan Jinbao, Zhang Hanrong, et al. Shale gas resource evaluation based on“pressure coefficient”: a case study of Upper Ordovician Wufeng-Lower Silurian Longmaxi formations in southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020,42(3):405-414.
[29] 王雅春，石荣.影响油气勘探经济评价的主控因素[J].特种油气藏, 2007,14(4):32-35.
Wang Yachun, Shi Rong. Factors affecting economic evaluation of oil and gas exploration[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2007,14(4):32-35.
[30] 熊运实，郭志红，梁涛，等.油气田开发对生态保护红线区域环境影响研究[J].油气田环境保护，2019,29(6):1-6.
Xiong Yunshi, Guo Zhihong, Liang Tao, et al. Study on the environmental impact on ecological protection red line in oil and gas field development[J]. Environmental Protection of Oil & Gas Fields, 2019,29(6):1-6.
[31] 刘可禹，刘建良.盆地和含油气系统模拟 (BPSM) 研究现状及发展趋势[J].石油科学通报，2017,2(2):161-175.
Liu Keyu, Liu Jianliang. Current status and future development trends of Basin and Petroleum System Modeling (BPSM)[J]. Petroleum Science Bulletin, 2017,2(2):161-175.
[32] 郭秋麟，陈宁生，柳庄小雪，等.盆地模拟关键技术之油气运聚模拟技术进展[J].石油实验地质，2020,42(5):846-857.
Guo Qiulin, Chen Ningsheng, Liu Zhuangxiaoxue, et al. Advance of basin modeling key techniques: hydrocarbon migration and accumulation simulation[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020,42(5):846-857.
[33] 石广仁.油气运聚定量模拟技术现状、问题及设想[J].石油与天然气地质，2009,30(1):1-10.
Shi Guangren. Status, problems and proposals of the quantitative modeling techniques for hydrocarbon migration and accumulation[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2009,30(1):1-10.
[34] 刘吉余，王明明，李景明.天然气运聚成藏过程模拟研究现状[J].天然气工业，2006,26(7):28-31.
Liu Jiyu, Wang Mingming, Li Jingming. Status of simulation study of gas migration and accumulation process[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2006,26(7):28-31.
[35] 石广仁，马进山，常军华.三维三相达西流法及其在库车坳陷的应用[J]. 石油与天然气地质，2010,31(4):403-409.
Shi Guangren, Ma Jinshan, Chang Junhua. 3-D 3-phase darcy flow method and its application to the Kuqa Depression[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2010,31(4):403-409.
[36] 郭秋麟，刘继丰，陈宁生，等.三维油气输导体系网格建模与运聚模拟技术[J].石油勘探与开发，2018,45(6):947-959.
Guo Qiulin, Liu Jifeng, Chen Ningsheng, et al. Mesh model building and migration and accumulation simulation of 3D hydrocarbon carrier system[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018,45(6):947-959.
[37] 郭秋麟，杨文静，肖中尧，等.不整合面下缝洞岩体油气运聚模型：以塔里木盆地碳酸盐岩油藏为例[J].石油实验地质，2013,35(5): 498-504.
Guo Qiulin, Yang Wenjing, Xiao Zhongyao, et al. Hydrocarbon migration and accumulation model of fractured-vuggy reservoir under unconformity surface：a case study of carbonate reservoir in Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2013, 35(5):498-504.
[38] 郭秋麟，陈宁生，谢红兵，等.基于有限体积法的三维油气运聚模拟技术[J].石油勘探与开发，2015,42(6):817-825.
Guo Qiulin, Chen Ningsheng, Xie Hongbing, et al. Three-dimensional hydrocarbon migration and accumulation modeling based on finite volume method[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015,42(6):817-825.
[39] 王庆永，贾忠华，刘晓峰，等.Visual MODFLOW及其在地下水模拟中的应用[J].水资源与水工程学报，2007,18(5):90-92.
Wang Qingyong, Jia Zhonghua, Liu Xiaofeng, et al. Visual MODFLOW and its application to groundwater simulation[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2007, 18(5):90-92.
[40] 刘苑，武晓峰.地下水中污染物运移过程数值模拟算法的比较[J].环境工程学报，2008,2(2):229-234.
Liu Yuan, Wu Xiaofeng. Numerical methods comparison in simulating contaminants movement in groundwater[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2008,2(2):229-234.
[41] 张洪，庞雄奇，姜振学，等.物理模拟在天然气成藏研究中的应用[J]. 新疆石油地质，2004,25(4):429-430.
Zhang Hong, Pang Xiongqi, Jiang Zhenxue, et al. Application of physical modeling to natural gas accumulation analysis[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2004,25(4):429-430.
[42] 徐旭辉，蔡利学，刘超英，等.油气勘探目标评价与优选系统[J]. 石油与天然气地质，2015,36(3):517-824.
Xu Xuhui, Cai Lixue, Liu Chaoying, et al. Evaluation and selection system for petroleum exploration targets[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2015,36(3):517-824.
[43] 闫相宾，刘超英，蔡利学.含油气区带评价方法探讨[J]. 石油与天然气地质，2010,31(6):857-864.
Yan Xiangbin, Liu Chaoying, Cai Lixue. A discussion on methods of play assessment[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2010,31(6): 857-864.
[44] 王永诗，赵乐强.隐蔽油气藏勘探阶段区带评价方法及实践：以济阳坳陷为例[J].油气地质与采收率，2010,17(3):1-5.
Wang Yongshi, Zhao Leqiang. Prospect evaluation approach and application in exploration stage of subtle reservoir-a case of Jiyang Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2010,17(3):1-5.
[45] 徐旭辉，方成名，陆建林，等.原型控源、迭加控藏：油气盆地资源分级评价与有利勘探方向优选思维及技术[J].石油实验地质，2020, 42(5):824-836.
Xu Xuhui, Fang Chengming, Lu Jianlin, et al. Hydrocarbon sources controlled by basin prototype and petroleum accumulation controlled by basin superposition: thoughts and technology of resource grading evaluation and exploration optimization in petroliferous basins[J]. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 2020,42(5):824-836.
[46] 盛秀杰，金之钧，肖晔.区带勘探中的油气资源评价方法[J].石油与天然气地质，2017,38(5):983-992.
Sheng Xiujie, Jin Zhijun, Xiao Ye. Petroleum resources assessment methodology in play exploration stages[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017,38(5):983-992.
[47] 宋洪庆，都书一，周园春，等.油气资源开发的大数据智能平台及应用分析[J].工程科学学报，2021,43(2):179-192.
Song Hongqing, Du Shuyi, Zhou Yuanchun, et al. Big data intelligent platform and application analysis for oil and gas resource development[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering, 2021, 43(2):179-192.
[48] 赵鹏大.数字地质与矿产资源评价[J].地质学刊，2012,36(3):225-228.
Zhao Pengda. Digital geology and mineral resources evaluation[J]. Journal of Geology, 2012,36(3):225-228.
[49] 郭秋麟，陈宁生，刘成林，等.油气资源评价方法研究进展与新一代评价软件系统[J].石油学报，2015,36(10):1305-1314.
Guo Qiulin, Chen Ningsheng, Liu Chenglin, et al. Research advance of hydrocarbon resource assessment method and a new assessment software system[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015,36(10): 1305-1314.
[50] 盛秀杰，金之钧，郭勤涛.油气资源评价一体化技术及软件实现的探讨[J].地质论评，2014,60(1):159-168.
Sheng Xiujie, Jin Zhijun, Guo Qintao. Discussion on integrated resource evaluation and software development[J]. Geological Review, 2014,60(1):159-168.
[51] 高虎.“双碳”目标下中国能源转型路径思考[J].国际石油经济，2021,29(3):1-6.
Gao Hu. China’s energy transformation under the targets of peaking carbon emissions and carbon neutral[J]. International Petroleum Economics, 2021,29(3):1-6.
[52] 陈新军.油气共伴生矿产综合勘查评价发展现状与趋势[J].中国国土资源经济，2020,33(5):34-38.
Chen Xinjun. Development status and trends of comprehensive exploration and evaluation of oil and gas associated minerals[J]. Natural Resource Economics of China, 2020,33(5):34-38.

Progress of key technologies for oil and gas resource assessment of Sinopec during the 13^th Five-Year Plan period and development direction

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	Zhao Wenzhi, Shen Anjiang, Qiao Zhanfeng, Zhang Jianyong, Ni Xinfeng. Theoretical progress in carbonate reservoir and discovery of large marine oil and gas fields in China [J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2022, 27(4): 1-15.
[2]	Shen Anjiang, Hu Anping, Liang Feng, She Min. Progress and application of carbonate reservoir simulation and geochemical experiment technology [J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2022, 27(4): 16-29.
[3]	Zhou Jingao, Zhang Tao , Yu Zhou, Wu Dongxu, Li Chengshan, Ding Zhenchun, Li Weiling, Liu Yuxin, Yin Chen. Lithofacies paleogeography in the deposition period of the fourth member of the Ordovician Majiagou Formation and its reservoir control effect, Ordos Basin [J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2022, 27(4): 61-74.
[4]	Fu Xiaodong, Chen Ya’na, Luo Bing, Li Wenzheng, Liu Ran, Wang Xiaofang, He Yuan, Gu Mingfeng, Jiang Hua. Evaluation of source rocks and petroleum system of the Lower Cambrian Maidiping Formation-Qiongzhusi Formation in the Middle-Upper Yangtze region [J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2022, 27(4): 103-120.
[5]	Zhang Ke, Pan Wenqing, Su Jin, Zhang Min. Distribution and hydrocarbon generation potential of the Nanhua-Cambrian source rocks in Tarim Basin [J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2022, 27(4): 121-134.
[6]	Duan Junmao, Zheng Jianfeng, Luo Xianying, Wang Yongsheng, Hao Yi. Micro-area geochemical constraints on the diagenesis and hydrocarbon accumulation history of dolomite reservoir of the Middle Permian Qixia Formation in northwest Sichuan Basin and its significance [J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2022, 27(4): 162-180.
[7]	Li Guoxin, Zhang Yongshu, Chen Yan, Zhang Guoqing, Wang Bo, Zhou Fei, Wu Zhixiong, Zhang Changhao, Lei Tao. Progress, orientation and countermeasures of petroleum exploration in Qaidam Basin [J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2022, 27(3): 1-19.
[8]	Ma Jun, Guan Linlin, Gao Quanfang, Zhou Dina, Liu Nana, Cheng Yiyan. Exploration and discovery of normal pressure shale gas in shallow anticline in southeast Chongqing area [J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2022, 27(3): 47-60.
[9]	Bao Zhidong, Li Zhongcheng, Chen Li, Wu Fan, Niu Bo, Wei Zhaosheng, Wang Zhenjun, Feng Congjun, Zhou Xinmao, Zhang Li, Zang Dongsheng, Li Quanquan, Liu Rui, Wan Pu, Li Lei. Fine reservoir characterization and capacity splitting of facies controlled oil reservoir in mature petroleum exploration areas [J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2022, 27(3): 61-77.
[10]	Yang Dongsheng, Liu Zhifeng, Wu Bin, Shen Pu, Chen Shaoping, Zhang Ying, Geng Mingyang. Tectonic evolution and its control on hydrocarbon accumulation of buried hill in the south section of Liaodong Bulge, Bohai Sea [J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2022, 27(3): 78-87.
[11]	Wuxi Institute of Petroleum Geology, Sinopec Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute, Sinopec Geophysical Research Institute, Sinopec Exploration Company. Progress of key technologies for oil and gas resource assessment of Sinopec during the 13^th Five-Year Plan period and development direction [J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 0, (): 1-.
[12]	Dou Lirong, Yuan Shengqiang, Liu Xiaobing. Progress and development countermeasures of overseas oil and gas exploration of Chinese oil corporations [J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2022, 27(2): 1-10.
[13]	Zhang Gongcheng, Feng Yangwei, Qu Hongjun. Characteristics of petroleum geology of global five deep-water basin belts [J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2022, 27(2): 11-26.
[14]	Wang Zhaoming, Wen Zhixin, He Zhengjun, Chen Ruiyin, Shi Haocheng, Chen Xi. Characteristics and enlightenment of new progress in global oil and gas exploration in recent ten years [J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2022, 27(2): 27-37.
[15]	Fu Jinhua, Liu Xinshe, Wei Liubin, Ren Junfeng, Gu Yonghong, Wang Qianping, Shi Pingping. Breakthrough and significance of natural gas exploration in the fourth member of Majiagou Formation of subsalt Ordovician in Ordos Basin [J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2022, 27(2): 47-58.