中国海相超深层碳酸盐岩油气成藏特点及勘探领域

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 进入中国海相盆地超深层碳酸盐岩地层中寻找油气是中国未来油气勘探的趋势之一。近年来，在塔里木盆地、四川盆地和鄂尔多斯盆地深层、超深层的油气勘探中，相继取得了重要进展。通过对塔里木盆地塔河油田、塔中北坡深层、四川盆地元坝气田等典型超深层碳酸盐岩油气藏基本特征的分析，认为海相超深层油气成藏主要有4 个基本控制因素：(1) 不同生物组合、岩性的优质烃源岩在低地温背景下，具有干酪根、古油藏、分散可溶有机质等多元生烃机制，提供了丰富烃源；(2) 构造、层序、岩相、流体与时间等因素，联合控制了不同类型优质储层的发育与分布，其中断裂活动、白云岩化和热流体活动对超深层优质储层的形成尤为关键；(3) 相对稳定构造背景下，不同岩性的区域盖层、局部盖层和直接盖层的多级封盖有利于油气的封盖与保存；(4) 不整合面、断裂和输导层与古隆起、古斜坡背景下各类圈闭的有效组合，决定了油气运聚、成藏的方式和效率。中国海相超深层碳酸盐岩资源潜力巨大，资源类型有油有气，以气为主。塔里木盆地超深层碳酸盐岩主要分布于几大隆起高部位之外的倾没端、斜坡区、凹陷区的寒武系—奥陶系中。四川盆地超深层碳酸盐岩主要分布于除川中地区外的海相下组合和川西、川东北前陆区的海相上组合中。鄂尔多斯盆地天环向斜和冲断带前缘的奥陶系是超深层碳酸盐岩现实的勘探领域。

关键词: 成藏特点, 勘探领域, 中国海相盆地, 超深层, 碳酸盐岩, 成藏特点, 勘探领域, 中国海相盆地, 超深层, 碳酸盐岩

Abstract: Searching for oil and gas in ultra-deep carbonate sequences in marine basins is becoming one of the major trends of future petroleum exploration in China. In recent years, major oil and gas discoveries have been made in the exploration of deep and ultra-deep sequences in petroliferous basins such as Tarim, Sichuan and Erdos. Based on analysis of the basic characteristics of the typical ultra-deep carbonate reservoirs in Tahe oilfield and the deep northern slope in Tazhong of Tarim Basin and Yuanba gas field of Sichuan Basin, it is concluded that hydrocarbon accumulation in ultra-deep marine carbonate is mainly controlled by 4 basic factors: (1) High quality source rocks. In low geothermal settings, source rocks of various biological combinations and lithologic types generated abundant hydrocarbons via multiple mechanisms such as kerogen, ancient oil reservoirs and dispersed dissoluble organic matter; (2) High quality reservoirs. The development and distribution of high quality reservoirs are jointly controlled by structure, sequence, lighology, fluid and their timing, among which faulting, dolomitization and thermal fluid activity are especially crucial to the formation of high quality ultra-deep reservoirs; (3) Multiple sealing mechanisms. Regional caprock, local caprock and direct caprock of various lithologies provide favorable conditions for the sealing and preservation of hydrocarbons; (4) Favorable hydrocarbon migration pathways. Effective combinations of unconformities, faults and carrier beds with various types of traps on paleo-highs and paleo-slopes determine the pattern and efficiency of hydrocarbon migration and accumulation. Ultra-deep marine carbonates in China have huge oil and gas resource potential, predominantly gas potential. In Tarim Basin, the exploration domains of the ultra-deep carbonates mainly distribute in the Cambrian and Ordovician in the pitching ends, slope zones and sags outside the structural highs of large uplifts; in Sichuan Basin, they mainly occur in the lower marine sequence assemblage outside central Sichuan and in the upper marine sequence assemblages in foreland areas of western and northeastern Sichuan; in Erdos Basin, they mainly include the Ordovician of Tianhuan syncline and thrust front.

Key words: carbonate rock, hydroc arbon accumulation characteristics, exploration domain, China marine basin, ultra-deep sequence, China marine basin, ultra-deep sequence, carbonate rock, hydroc arbon accumulation characteristics, exploration domain

何治亮, 金晓辉, 沃玉进, 李慧莉, 白振瑞, 焦存礼, 张仲培. 中国海相超深层碳酸盐岩油气成藏特点及勘探领域[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2016, 21(1): 3-14.

He Zhiliang, Jin Shaohui, Wo Yujin, Li Huili, Bai Zhenrui, Jiao Cunli, Zhang Zhongpei. Hydrocarbon accumulation characteristics and exploration domains of ultradeep marine carbonates in China[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2016, 21(1): 3-14.

参考文献

[1] 贾承造, 李本亮, 张兴阳，等. 中国海相盆地的形成与演化[J]. 科学通报,2007,12(3):155-220.Jia Chenzao, Li Benliang, Zhang Xingyang, et al . Formation and evolution of Chinese marine basins[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2007,12(3):155-220.
[2] 贾承造. 中国叠合盆地形成演化与中下组合油气勘探潜力[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2006,11(1):1-4. Jia Chengzao. The formation of superimposed basins and exploration potential of middle and lower combinations in China[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2006,11(1):1-4.
[3] 金之钧. 中国海相碳酸盐岩层系油气勘探特殊性问题[J]. 地学前缘, 2005,12(3):15-22. Jin Zhijun.Particularity of petroleum exploration on marine carbonate strata in China sedimentary basins[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2005,12(3):15-22.
[4] 康玉柱. 塔里木盆地沙参2 井海相油气首次发现的历程与启迪[J]. 石油与天然气质,2014,35(6):749-752.
Kang Yvzhu.The first marine petroleum discovery in China and its significance[J]. Oil and Gas Geology, 2014,35(6):749-752.
[5] 甯濛, 刘殊, 龚文平. 川西坳陷三叠系雷口坡组顶部白云岩储层分布预测[J]. 中国石油勘探，2015,20(3):30-37. Ning Meng, Liu Shu, Gong Wenping.Prediction of dolomite reservoir distribution on top of Triassic Leikoupo Formation in Chuanxi depression[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2015, 20(3):30-37.
[6] 马永生, 蔡勋育, 赵培荣. 深层、超深层碳酸盐岩油气储层形成机理研究综述[J]. 地学前缘, 2011,18(4):181-192. Ma Yongsheng, Cai Xunyv, Zhao Peirong. The research status and advances in porosity evolution and diagenesis of deep carbonate reservoir[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2011,18(4):181-192.
[7] 翟晓先. 塔里木盆地塔河特大型油气田勘探实践与认识[J], 石油实验地质, 2011,33(4):477-480. Zhai Xiaoxian. Exploration practice and experience of Tahe giant oil-and-gas field,Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Gelolgy & Experiment, 2011,33(4):477-480.
[8] 何海清, 李建忠. 中国石油“十一五”以来油气勘探成果、地质新认识与技术进展[J]. 中国石油勘探，2014,19(6):1-13. He Haiqing, Li Jianzhong. PetroChina’s oil and gas exploration results, new geological theories and technological achievements since 11th Five-Year Plan period[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2014,19(6):1-13.
[9] 马永生, 郭旭升, 郭彤楼, 等. 四川盆地普光大型气田的发现与勘探启示[J]. 地质论评, 2005,51(4):323-331.Ma Yongsheng, Guo Xusheng, Guo Tonglou, et al . Discovery the large-scale Puguang gas field in the Sichuan Basin and

[1]	王红军, 张良杰, 陈怀龙, 张宏伟, 白振华, 蒋凌志. 阿姆河右岸盐下侏罗系大中型气田地质特征与分布规律[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(4): 52-64.
[2]	杨海军, 邓兴梁, 张银涛, 谢舟, 李勇, 李世银, 张海祖, 朱永峰, 陈永权. 塔里木盆地满深1井奥陶系超深断控碳酸盐岩油气藏勘探重大发现及意义[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(3): 13-23.
[3]	杨雨, 文龙, 谢继容, 罗冰, 黄平辉, 冉崎, 周刚, 张玺华, 汪华, 田兴旺, 张亚, 陈聪. 四川盆地海相碳酸盐岩天然气勘探进展与方向[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(3): 44-55.
[4]	李明隆, 谭秀成, 罗冰, 张亚, 张本健, 芦飞凡, 苏成鹏, 肖笛, 钟原. 四川盆地西北部中二叠统栖霞组相控早期高频暴露岩溶特征及启示[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(3): 66-82.
[5]	李海英, 刘军, 龚伟, 黄超, 任丽丹. 顺北地区走滑断裂与断溶体圈闭识别描述技术[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(3): 107-120.
[6]	陈强路, 席斌斌, 韩俊, 许锦, 吴鲜, 朱秀香, 马中良. 塔里木盆地顺托果勒地区超深层油藏保存及影响因素：来自流体包裹体的证据[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(3): 121-133.
[7]	曹红霞, 吴海燕, 任星民, 武渝, 梁全胜, 仝敏波. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部奥陶系岩溶古地貌与储层分布规律[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(3): 146-155.
[8]	潘建国, 李劲松, 王宏斌, 李闯, 丰超, 周俊峰. 深层—超深层碳酸盐岩储层地震预测技术研究进展与趋势[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(3): 156-166.
[9]	冯庆付, 翟秀芬, 冯周, 刘朱睿鸷, 刘英明. 四川盆地二叠系—三叠系碳酸盐岩核磁共振实验测量及分析[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(3): 167-174.
[10]	李剑, 佘源琦, 高阳, 杨桂茹, 李明鹏, 杨慎. 中国陆上深层—超深层天然气勘探领域及潜力[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(4): 403-417.
[11]	李阳, 代宗仰, 黄蕾, 周晓龙, 葛伟峰, 单俊峰, 刘宁. 叠合概率法在碳酸盐岩储层评价中的应用——以辽河坳陷西部凹陷高升地区沙四段为例[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(3): 361-368.
[12]	蔚远江, 杨涛, 郭彬程, 许小溪, 詹路锋, 杨超. 前陆冲断带油气资源潜力、勘探领域分析与有利区带优选[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(1): 46-59.
[13]	王平, 潘文庆, 李世银, 关宝珠, 熊昶, 陈雷. 塔中超深碳酸盐岩储层水平井轨迹优化技术及应用[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(1): 123-128.
[14]	王珂, 张荣虎, 方晓刚, 王俊鹏, 张同辉. 超深层裂缝—孔隙型致密砂岩储层特征与属性建模——以库车坳陷克深8气藏为例[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2018, 23(6): 87-96.
[15]	吴国海, 林雅平, 罗曼, 余明发, 毛海涛, 孙利国. 利用测井资料寻找碳酸盐岩高产储层——以伊拉克库尔德地区Shakan油田侏罗系为例[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2018, 23(6): 97-106.