中国石油勘探 ›› 2024, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6): 43-55.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2024.06.004

• 勘探案例 • 上一篇    下一篇

咸化湖盆深层优质滩坝砂储集特征与主要控制因素——以柴达木盆地扎哈泉地区上干柴沟组为例

伍劲,刘占国,朱超,宫清顺   

  1. 中国石油杭州地质研究院
  • 出版日期:2024-11-15 发布日期:2024-11-15
  • 作者简介:伍劲(1990-),男,四川成都人,硕士,2015年毕业于中国石油大学(北京),高级工程师,现主要从事储层地质学方面工作。地址:浙江省杭州市西湖区西溪路920号中国石油杭州地质研究院,邮政编码:310023。
  • 基金资助:
    中国石油天然气集团有限公司攻关性应用性科技专项“超深层碎屑岩大中型油气田形成条件与有利区评价”(2023ZZ14-01);中国石油天然气集团有限公司基础性前瞻性重大科技专项“叠合盆地中下组合油气成藏与保持机制研究”(2023ZZ02)。

Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors for high-quality beach bar sand bodies in deep formation in saline lake basins: a case study of Upper Ganchaigou Formation in Zhahaquan area, Qaidam Basin

Wu Jin, Liu Zhanguo, Zhu Chao, Gong Qingshun   

  1. PetroChina Hangzhou Research institute of Geology
  • Online:2024-11-15 Published:2024-11-15

摘要: 柴达木盆地扎哈泉地区在4500m 以深咸化湖盆中仍发育优质碎屑岩储层且高产工业油流,但相似埋深的储层物性存在明显差异。为明确咸化湖盆储层物性主控因素及有效储层厚度下限,以扎哈泉地区上干柴沟组为研究对象,综合利用岩心观察、铸体薄片鉴定、岩石物性测试、压汞测试等分析方法,开展不同沉积微相砂体储集性能对比分析。研究认为:扎哈泉地区滨浅湖滩坝砂主要为坝主体砂、坝缘砂和滩砂3 种沉积砂体,储集空间以原生孔为主,储集性能由好到差依次为坝主体砂、坝缘砂和滩砂。压实作用和胶结作用是造成储层孔隙损失的主要成岩作用,相同微相储层压实程度相当,胶结作用强度的差异是造成不同厚度滩坝砂储层物性差异和单一滩坝砂储层内部物性非均质性的主要原因。原始沉积水动力条件、早期胶结作用、较早的油气充注和早缓晚快的埋藏史共同控制深层优质滩坝砂储层的形成。在明确常规有效储层孔隙度下限为8% 的基础上,预测粉粒至细粒滩坝砂储层有效厚度下限为1m,中细粒至中粒滩坝砂储层有效厚度下限为0.5m。

关键词: 柴达木盆地, 咸化湖, 上干柴沟组, 滩坝砂, 储集特征, 成岩作用, 控制因素, 有效厚度下限

Abstract: High-quality reservoirs with high-yield oil flow are still developed in the deep saline lake basin (burial depth>4500 m) in Zahaquan area, Qaidam Basin. But there are significant differences in the physical properties of clastic rock reservoirs at similar burial depths. In order to clarify the main controlling factors for reservoir physical properties and the lower limit of effective reservoir thickness in saline lake basins, Upper Ganchaigou Formation in Zhahaquan area is studied in this paper. By comprehensively using experimental methods such as core observation, cast thin section identification, rock physical properties test, and mercury injection test, comparative analysis is conducted on reservoir performance of sand bodies with various sedimentary microfacies. The study results show that sand bodies of shallow shore lake beach bar microfacies in Zhahaquan area are subdivided into three types, i.e., bar main sand, bar edge sand, and beach sand. The reservoir space is dominated by primary pores, and the bar main sand has the best reservoir performance, followed by bar edge sand and beach sand. The compaction and cementation were the main diagenetic processes that caused pore loss in reservoirs. The compaction degree of reservoirs of the same microfacies was equivalent, while the difference in cementation strength generally led to the variation in physical properties of beach bar sand reservoirs with various thicknesses and the heterogeneity of single beach bar sand reservoir. The high-quality beach bar sand reservoirs in deep formations were jointly controlled by the original sedimentary hydrodynamic conditions, early cementation, early oil and gas charging, and early slow and late rapid burial history. After clarifying the lower limit of conventional effective reservoir porosity, which is 8%, it is predicted that the lower limit of effective thickness for silty to fine-grained beach bar sand reservoirs is 1 m, and that for medium- to finegrained beach bar sand reservoirs is 0.5 m.

Key words: Qaidam Basin, saline lake, Upper Ganchaigou Formation, beach bar sand, reservoir characteristics, diagenesis, controlling factor, lower limit of effective thickness

中图分类号: