涪陵气田立体开发地质工程一体化实践

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2024.03.002

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对涪陵页岩气田一次井网开发后剩余气储量动用不充分的问题，立体开发地质工程一体化技术是提高气藏采收率，实现对剩余储量精准动用的核心手段。通过建立页岩气地质工程一体化高效开发新模式，创新形成页岩气建模数模一体化技术进行剩余气精细研究，明确页岩剩余气分布情况；通过地质工程双甜点耦合，明确穿行黄金靶窗，建立“资源+应力+天然裂缝”三位一体分层效益组合体划分标准体系；基于剩余气差异化分布形态，建立“地质—钻井—压裂—地面协同优化”钻井与压裂优化设计流程；通过实时监测进行钻井轨迹与压裂施工的动态调整，建立一体化数据共享平台及实时决策系统。立体开发地质工程一体化技术指导焦石坝区块预期采收率从12.6%提高到23.3%，立体开发区采收率达39.2%。该技术的应用使页岩气钻采投资、10×10⁸m³产能建设投资及开发成本逐年缩减，有效指导了涪陵页岩气田提高采收率与高效开发。

关键词: 涪陵页岩气田, 地质工程一体化, 立体开发, 提高采收率, 剩余气分布

Abstract: In view of the insufficient utilization of residual gas reserves by primary well pattern development in Fuling Shale Gas Field, geology and engineering integrated stereoscopic development technology is the core means to improve gas recovery and achieve accurate utilization of residual gas reserves. As a result, a new high-efficiency shale gas development mode with geology and engineering integration has been established, and shale gas modeling and simulation integrated technology has been innovatively developed to conduct fine research and identify the distribution of residual shale gas; The coupling of geological and engineering double sweet spots enables to determine the gold target window of well drilling trajectory, and the classification standard system of “resource + stress + natural fracture” three-in-one layered benefit combination has been established; Based on the differential distribution pattern of residual gas, the drilling and fracturing optimization design process has been established with “geology-drilling-fracturing-surface collaborative optimization”; By using real-time monitoring, the dynamic adjustment of well drilling trajectory and fracturing construction has been conducted, and integrated data sharing platform and real-time decision system have been constructed. The geology and engineering integrated stereoscopic development technology has guided the development of Jiaoshiba block and increased estimated recovery rate from 12.6% to 23.3%, and up to 39.2% in the stereoscopic development zone. The application of this technology supports to reduce shale gas drilling and production investment, and billion square meter production capacity construction investment and development costs year by year, which effectively guides the recovery enhancement and high-efficiency development of Fuling Shale Gas Field.

中图分类号:

TE357.1

路智勇, 刘莉, 姜宇玲, 张谦, 湛小红, 肖佳林. 涪陵气田立体开发地质工程一体化实践[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2024, 29(3): 10-20.

Lu Zhiyong, Liu Li, Jiang Yuling, Zhang Qian, Zhan Xiaohong, Xiao Jialin. Practice of geology and engineering integration in the stereoscopic development of Fuling Gas Field[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2024, 29(3): 10-20.

参考文献

[1] Keith S. Applying fundamentals“101”of unconventional shale production to the exploration and development of the Wolfcamp“A”, Wolfcamp“B”, and Lower Spraberry Shale, a case study[J]. Search and Discovery, 2015:110209.
[2] Gakhar K, Shan D, Rodionov Y, et al. Engineered approach for multi-well pad development in Eagle Ford shale[R]. San Antonio, Texas. Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, 2016.
[3] Liu Y, Bordoloi S, McMahan N, et al. Bakken infill pilot analysis and modeling: characterizing unconventional reservoir potentials[R]. SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, 2020.
[4] Mckimmy M, Hari-Roy S, Cipolla C, et al. Hydraulic fracture geometry, morphology, and parent-child interactions: Bakken case study[R]. The Woodlands, Texas, USA: SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition, 2022.
[5] Ramiro R, Romero S. Rock-eval basic/bulk-rock vs. shale play methods for characterization of unconventional shale resource systems: application to the Eagle Ford Shale, Texas[J]. Search and Discovery, 2017:51379.
[6] Donovan A D, Staerker T S, Gardner R M, et al. Findings from the Eagle Ford Outcrops of West Texas&implication to the Subsurface of South Texas[M]//bryer J A. The Eagle Ford shale: a renaissance in U.S. oil production: AAPG Memoir 110. Tulsa: American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 2016:301-336.
[7] Hentz T, Ruppel. Reginal stratigraphic and reock characteristics of Eagle Ford shale in its play area: Maverick Basin to East Texas Basin[J]. Search and Discovery, 2021:10325.
[8] Jacobs T. Frac hits reveal well spacing may be too tight, completion volumes too large[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2017,69(11):35-38.
[9] 马永生，蔡勋育，赵培荣.中国页岩气勘探开发理论认识与实践[J].石油勘探与开发，2018,45(4):561-574.
Ma Yongsheng, Cai Xunyu, Zhao Peirong. China’s shale gas exploration and development: understanding and practice[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018,45(4):561-574.
[10] 孙焕泉，周德华，蔡勋育，等. 中国石化页岩气发展现状与趋势[J].中国石油勘探，2020,25(2):14-26.
Sun Huanquan, Zhou Dehua, Cai Xunyu, et al. Progress and prospect of shale gas development of Sinopec[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020,25(2):14-26.
[11] 蔡勋育，赵培荣，高波，等.中国石化页岩气“十三五”发展成果与展望[J].石油与天然气地质，2021,42(1):16-27.
Cai Xunyu, Zhao Peirong, Gao Bo, et al. Sinopec’s shale gas development achievements during the“Thirteenth Five-Year Plan”period and outlook for the future[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021,42(1):16-27.
[12] 吴奇，梁兴，鲜成钢，等.地质—工程一体化高效开发中国南方海相页岩气[J].中国石油勘探，2015,20(4):1-23.
Wu Qi, Liang Xing, Xian Chenggang, et al. Geoscience-to-production integration ensures effective and efficient south China marine shale gas development[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2015,20(4):1-23.
[13] 胡文瑞.地质工程一体化是实现复杂油气藏效益勘探开发的必由之路[J].中国石油勘探，2017,22(1):1-5.
Hu Wenrui. Geology-engineering integration a necessary way to realize profitable exploration and development of complex reservoirs[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2017,22(1):1-5.
[14] 孙焕泉，周德华，赵培荣，等.中国石化地质工程一体化发展方向[J].油气藏评价与开发，2021,11(3):269-280.
Sun Huanquan, Zhou Dehua, Zhao Peirong, et al. Geology-engineering integration development direction of Sinopec[J].Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021,11(3): 269-280.
[15] 陈颖杰，刘阳，徐婧源，等.页岩气地质工程一体化导向钻井技术[J].石油钻探技术，2015,43(5):56-62.
Chen Yingjie, Liu Yang, Xu Jingyuan, et al. Interated steering drilling technology for geology engineering of shale gas[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2015,43(5):56-62.
[16] 鲜成钢.页岩气地质工程一体化建模及数值模拟：现状、挑战和机遇[J].石油科技论坛，2018,37(5):24-34.
Xian Chenggang. Shale gas geological engineering integrated modeling and numerical simulation: present conditions, challenges and opportunities[J]. Petroleum Science and Technology Forum, 2018,37(5):24-34.
[17] 蒋廷学，卞晓冰，左罗，等.非常规油气藏体积压裂全生命周期地质工程一体化技术[J].油气藏评价与开发，2021,11(3):297-304,339.
Jiang Tingxue, Bian Xiaobing, Zuo Luo, et al. Whole lifecycle geology-engineering integration of volumetric fracturing technology in unconventional reservoir[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021,11(3):297-304,339.
[18] 赵春段，张介辉，蒋佩，等.页岩气地质工程一体化过程中的多尺度裂缝建模及其应用[J].石油物探，2022,61(4):719-732.
Zhao Chunduan, Zhang Jiehui, Jiang Pei, et al. Multi-scale fracture modelling and its application in shale gas geology and engineering integration[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2022,61(4):719-732.
[19] 谢军，张浩淼，佘朝毅，等.地质工程一体化在长宁国家级页岩气示范区中的实践[J].中国石油勘探，2017,22(1):21-28.
Xie Jun, Zhang Haomiao, She Chaoyi, et al. Practice of geology-engineering integration in Changning State Shale Gas Demonstration Area[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2017, 22(1):21-28.
[20] 包汉勇，梁榜，郑爱维，等.地质工程一体化在涪陵页岩气示范区立体勘探开发中的应用[J].中国石油勘探，2022,27(1):88-98.
Bao Hanyong, Liang Bang, Zheng Aiwei, et al. Application of geology and engineering integration in stereoscopic exploration and development of Fuling shale gas demonstration area[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2022,27(1):88-98.
[21] 刘乃震，王国勇，熊小林.地质工程一体化技术在威远页岩气高效开发中的实践与展望[J].中国石油勘探，2018,23(2):59-68.
Liu Naizhen, Wang Guoyong, Xiong Xiaolin. Practice and prospect of geology-engineering integration technology in the efficient development of shale gas in Weiyuan block[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2018,23(2):59-68.
[22] 唐建信，钱坤，唐人选.苏北盆地帅垛复杂断块油田地质工程一体化高效开发实践[J].油气藏评价与开发，2021,11(3):377-383.
Tang Jianxin, Qian Kun, Tang Renxuan. Practice of geology-engineering integration development of Shuaiduo Oilfield with complex fault in Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021,11(3):377-383.
[23] 王瑞杰，王永康，马福建，等.页岩油地质工程一体化关键技术研究与应用：以鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组长7段为例[J].中国石油勘探，2022,27(1):151-163.
Wang Ruijie, Wang Yongkang, Ma Fujian, et al. Research and application of key technologies of geology and engineering integration for shale oil development: a case study of Chang 7 member of the Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2022,27(1):151-163.
[24] 方健，张卿，李雪松，等.长宁国家级页岩气示范区水平井地质工程一体化导向技术应用[C].中国石油学会天然气专业委员会.第31届全国天然气学术年会（2019）论文集，2019.
Fang Jian, Zhang Qing, Li Xuesong, et al. Application of geoengineering integration guidance technology for horizontal wells in Changning District National Shale Gas Demonstration Zone[C]. Natural Gas Committee of China Petroleum Society. Proceedings of the 31st National Natural Gas Academic Conference (2019), 2019.
[25] 雍锐，常程，张德良，等.地质—工程—经济一体化页岩气水平井井距优化：以国家级页岩气开发示范区宁209井区为例[J].天然气工业，2020,40(7):42-48.
Yong Rui, Chang Cheng, Zhang Deliang. Optimization of shale-gas horizontal well spacing based on geology-engineering-economy integration: a case study of Well block Ning 209 in the National Shale Gas Development Demonstration Area[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020,40(7):42-48.
[26] 赵勇，李南颖，杨建，等.深层页岩气地质工程一体化井距优化：以威荣页岩气田为例[J].油气藏评价与开发，2021,11(3):340-347.
Zhao Yong, Li Nanying, Yang Jian, et al. Optimization of deep shale gas well spacing based on geology-engineering integration: a case study of Weirong Shale Gas Field[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021,11(3): 340-347.
[27] 王红岩，刘钰洋，张晓伟，等.基于层次分析法的页岩气储层地质工程一体化甜点评价：以昭通页岩气示范区太阳页岩气田海坝地区X井区为例[J].地球科学，2023,48(1):92-109.
Wang Hongyan, Liu Yuyang, Zhang Xiaowei, et al. Geology Engineering intergration shale gas sweet spot evaluation based on analytic hierarchy process: application to Zhaotong Shale Gas Demonstration District, Taiyang Shale Gas Field, Haiba Area, X Well Region[J]. Earth Science, 2023,48(1):92-109.
[28] 王惠君，卢双舫，乔露，等.南川页岩气地质工程一体化优化中的参数敏感性分析[J].地球科学，2023,48(1):267-278.
Wang Huijun, Lu Shuangfang, Qiao Lu, et al. Parameter sensitivity analysis in geology engineering integration optimization for shale gas in Nanchuan Block[J]. Earth Science,2023,48(1):267-278.
[29] Rafiee M, Grover T. Well spacing optimization in Eagle Ford shale: an operator’s experience[C]. SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, 2017.
[30] Stegent N, Candler C. Downhole microseismic mapping of more than 400 fracturing stages on a multiwell pad at the Hydraulic Fracturing Test Site (HFTS): discussion of operational challenges and analytic results[C]. Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Houston, Texas. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2018:3754-3781.
[31] Wood T, Leonard R, Senters C, et al. Interwell communication study of UWC and MWC wells in the HFTS[C]. Houston, Texas: Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, 2018: 1394-1403.
[32] Alimahomed F, Malpani R, Jose R, et al. Development of the stacked pay in the Delaware basin, Permian Basin[C]. SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, 2018.
[33] Damani A, Kanneganti K, Malpani R. Sequencing hydraulic fractures to optimize production for stacked well development in the Delaware Basin[R]. Austin, Texas, USA: Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, 2020.
[34] 孙焕，蔡勋育，胡德高，等.页岩气立体开发理论技术与实践：以四川盆地涪陵页岩气田为例[J].石油勘探与开发，2023,50(3):1-12.
Sun Huanquan, Cai Xunyu, Hu Degao, et al. Theory, technology and practice of shale gas three-dimensional development: a case study of Fuling shale gas field in Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2023,50(3):1-12.