昭通国家级示范区页岩气一体化高效开发模式及实践启示

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2017.01.005

中国石油勘探 ›› 2017, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (1): 29-37.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2017.01.005

昭通国家级示范区页岩气一体化高效开发模式及实践启示

梁兴¹, 王高成¹, 张介辉¹, 舒红林¹, 刘臣¹, 李兆丰¹, 徐政语², 张朝¹, 李德旗¹, 焦亚军¹, 张永强¹, 李庆飞¹, 覃军¹, 尹开贵¹, 罗瑀峰¹

1 中国石油浙江油田公司;
2 中国石油杭州地质研究院

收稿日期:2016-09-08 修回日期:2016-11-20 出版日期:2017-01-10 发布日期:2016-12-30
作者简介:梁兴(1965-),男,广西北流人,博士,2006年毕业于西南石油大学,教授级高级工程师,主要从事页岩气、煤层气、高凝油和常规气综合评价及勘探开发管理工作。地址:浙江省杭州市西湖区留下荆山岭中国石油浙江油田公司,邮政编码:310023。E-mail:liangx85@petrochina.com.cn
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项“云南昭通页岩气开采试验”（2012ZX0518-006）；中国石油天然气集团公司重大专项“昭通示范区页岩气钻采工程现场试验”（2012F-47-02）。

High-efficiency integrated shale gas development model of Zhaotong National Demonstration Zone and its practical enlightenment

Liang Xing¹, Wang Gaocheng¹, Zhang Jiehui¹, Shu Honglin¹, Liu Chen¹, Li Zhaofeng¹, Xu Zhengyu², Zhang Zhao¹, Li Deqi¹, Jiao Yajun¹, Zhang Yongqiang¹, Li Qingfei¹, Qin Jun¹, Yin Kaigui¹, Luo Yufeng¹

1 PetroChina Zhejiang Oilfield Company;
2 PetroChina Hangzhou Institute of Geology

Received:2016-09-08 Revised:2016-11-20 Online:2017-01-10 Published:2016-12-30
Contact: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2017.01.005

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 与已成功开发页岩气的北美地区及四川盆地内勘探开发区块不同，昭通国家级页岩气示范区地质条件复杂、山地地形地貌、钻采工程实施难度大、作业成本高、安全环保管理要求高、页岩气开发风险大。通过“一体化技术手段保质量、促产量，创新管理模式提效率、要效益”的开发思路，探索了适用于南方海相山地页岩气条件的产建一体化IPDP（Integrated Project Development by Production）高效开发模式。IPDP模式以勘探与开发、地质与工程、科研与生产一体化为基础，以一体化项目运作IPMP（Integrated Project Management by Production）模式和地质与工程技术支撑团队为保障，采用“效益产量为目标导向、工程技术保障、逆向思维设计、正向组织实施、工厂化作业”的工作机制，全方位推行全生命周期一体化项目组织实施做法，从而实现由研究评价、现场生产实施到项目组织管理全过程把控的山地页岩气钻采工程品质和气井产量。通过采用与单井产气量挂钩的一体化风险项目总包模式，增强效益产量责任意识，优化生产组织，确保各环节无缝衔接，有效提高作业效率，实现降本增效，规避了开发风险，实施效果显著，为南方海相山地页岩气高效开发作出了有益探索。

关键词: 山地页岩气, 地质工程一体化, 一体化, 工厂化, IPDP, IPMP, 黄金坝, 昭通

Abstract: The Zhaotong National Shale Gas Demonstration Zone is different from the explored and developed blocks in North America and the Sichuan Basin where shale gas has been successfully developed. It is characterized by complex geology, mountainous landform, high difficulty in drilling and production engineering, high operation cost, high-level safety and environment management and high risks in shale gas development. According to the development concept of “ensuring the quality and promoting the production by integrated technologies, and increasing the efficiency and improving the benefit by innovative management model”, the IPDP (Integrated Project Development by Production) high-efficiency development model which is suitable for the marine mountain shale gas in South China was proposed. The IPDP model is based on exploration-development integration, geology-engineering integration and research-production integration, and it is technically supported by the IPMP (Integrated Project Management by Production) model and geology & engineering teams. In this model, the life-cycle integrated project organization and implementation is carried out according to the working mechanism of “beneficial production as the target, engineering technology as the support, reverse thinking based design, positive organization and implementation, and factory-like operation”. In this way, the drilling and production engineering quality and well production rate of mountain shale gas are controlled all through the process from the aspects of research and evaluation, field production and implementation, and project organization and management. By virtue of the turnkey model of integrated risk project which is linked to individual-well gas production rate, the sense of responsibility for beneficial production is enhanced and the production organization is optimized, so that each link is seamlessly connected, operation efficiency is effectively increased, the cost is decreased, the benefit is increased, the development risk is avoided, and implementation result is remarkable. It provides valuable references for the high-efficient development of marine mountain shale gas in South China.

Key words: mountain shale gas, geology-engineering integration, integration, factory-like, Integrated Project Development by Production (IPDP), Integrated Project Management by Production (IPMP), Huangjinba, Zhaotong

中图分类号:

TE313

梁兴, 王高成, 张介辉, 舒红林, 刘臣, 李兆丰, 徐政语, 张朝, 李德旗, 焦亚军, 张永强, 李庆飞, 覃军, 尹开贵, 罗瑀峰. 昭通国家级示范区页岩气一体化高效开发模式及实践启示[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2017, 22(1): 29-37.

Liang Xing, Wang Gaocheng, Zhang Jiehui, Shu Honglin, Liu Chen, Li Zhaofeng, Xu Zhengyu, Zhang Zhao, Li Deqi, Jiao Yajun, Zhang Yongqiang, Li Qingfei, Qin Jun, Yin Kaigui, Luo Yufeng. High-efficiency integrated shale gas development model of Zhaotong National Demonstration Zone and its practical enlightenment[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2017, 22(1): 29-37.

参考文献

[1] 吴奇，梁兴，鲜成钢，等．地质—工程一体化高效开发中国南方海相页岩气[J]．中国石油勘探，2015,20(4):1-23. Wu Qi, Liang Xing, Xian Chenggang, et al. Geoscience-to-production integration ensures effective and efficient South China marine shale gas development[J].China Petroleum Exploration, 2015, 20(4),1-23.
[2] 郭彤楼，刘若冰．复杂构造区高演化程度海相页岩气勘探突破的启示——以四川盆地东部盆缘JY1井为例[J]．天然气地球科学，2013,24(4):643-651. Guo Tonglou,Liu Ruobing.Implications from marine shale gas exploration breakthrough in complicated structural area at high thermal stage:Taking Longmaxi Formation in Well JY-1 as an example[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2013,24(4):643-651.
[3] 王志刚．涪陵页岩气勘探开发重大突破与启示[J]．石油与天然气地质，2015,36(1):1-6. Wang Zhigang. Breakthrough of Fuling shale gas exploration and development and its inspiration[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2015,36(1):1-6.
[4] 郭旭升，胡东风，魏志红，等. 涪陵页岩气田的发现与勘探认识[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2016,21(3):24-37. Guo Xusheng, Hu Dongfeng, Wei Zhihong, et al. Discovery and exploration of Fuling shale gas field[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2016,21(3):24-37.
[5] 武瑾，梁峰，拜文华，等.渝东北地区下志留统龙马溪组页岩气勘探前景[J].特种油气藏，2015,22(6):50-55. Wu Jin, Liang Feng, Bai Wenhua, et al. Exploration prospect of Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation shale gas in northeastern Chongqing City[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2015,22(6)：50-55.
[6] 杜金虎,杨涛,李欣,等. 中国石油天然气股份有限公司“十二五”油气勘探发现与“十三五”展望[J].中国石油勘探，2016,21(2):1-15. Du Jinhu, Yang Tao, Li Xin，et al. Oil and gas exploration and discovery of Petro China Company Limited during the 12th Five-Year Plan and the prospect during the 13th Five-Year Plan[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2016,21(2):1-15.
[7] Liang Xing, Jiao Yajun, Wang Gaocheng, et al. Technology feasibility and production driver study in the first integrated shale gas block in Sichuan Basin[C].SPE 176861-MS , SPE Asia Pacific Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition, Brisbane, Australia, 9-11 November 2015.
[8] 梁兴，王高成，徐政语,等. 中国南方海相复杂山地页岩气储层甜点综合评价技术[J]. 天然气工业，2016,36(1):33-42. Liang Xing, Wang Gaocheng, Xu Zhengyu, et al. Comprehensive evaluation technology for shale gas sweet spots in the complex marine mountains, South China: A case study from Zhaotong national shale gas demonstration zone[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2016,36(1):33-42.
[9] 吴奇.地质导向与旋转导向技术应用及发展[M].北京:石油工业出版社，2012. Wu Qi. Application and development of geosteering and rotary steerable techniques[M].Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2012.
[10] Liang Xing, Wang Lizhi, Zhang Jiehui, et al. 100% in the sweet section: an effective geosteering approach for Silurian Longmaxi shale play in Sichuan Basin[C]. SPE 176945-MS, SPE Asia Pacific Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition, Brisbane, Australia, 9-11 November 2015.
[11] 陈志鹏，梁兴，王高成,等．旋转地质导向技术在水平井中的应用及体会——以昭通页岩气示范区为例[J]．天然气工业, 2015,35(12):64-70. Chen Zhipeng;Liang Xing;Wang Gaocheng, et al. Application of rotary geosteering technology in horizontal wells and its implication: a case study of the Zhaotong shale gas demonstration area of Yunnan[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2015,35(12):64-70.
[12] 王军，李艳东，甘利灯．基于蚂蚁各向异性的裂缝表征方法[J]．石油地球物理勘探，2013,48(5):763-770. Wang Jun,Li Yandong,Gan Lideng. Fracture characterization based on azimuthal anisotropy of ant-tracking attribute volumes[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2013,48(5):763-770.
[13] Mark Alberty, Kristi Fink. The use of connection and total gases quantitatively in the assessment of shale pore pressure[J]. SPE Drilling & Completion, 2013,29(2):208-214.
[14] 傅津，刘志刚．国际油田服务公司一体化发展的经验和启示[J]．国际石油经济，2012,20(4):26-33. Fu Jin,Liu Zhigang.Lessons from international oilfield service companies for integrated development[J]. International Petroleum Economics, 2012,4:26-33.
[15] 李颂，李俊廷．海外油气勘探项目综合评价方法[J]．天然气地球科学，2012，23(4) ：807-812. Li Song,Li Junting. Comprehensive evaluation method of oversea opportunity in oil and gas exploration[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2012,23(4):807-812.
[16] 李文阳，邹洪岚，吴纯忠,等．从工程技术角度浅析页岩气的开采[J]．石油学报，2013,`34(6):1218-1224. Li Wenyang,Zou Honglan,Wu Chunzhong, et al. An analysis of shale gas development in view of engineering technologies[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013,34(6):1218-1224.
[17] 曾义金．页岩气开发的地质与工程一体化技术[J]．石油钻探技术，2014,42(1)：1-6. Zeng Yijin.Integration technology of geology & engineering for shale gas development[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2014,42(1):1-6.
[18] 钱斌，张俊成，朱炬辉,等．四川盆地长宁地区页岩气水平井组“拉链式”压裂实践[J]．天然气工业，2015，35(1):81-84. Qian Bin,Zhang Juncheng,Zhu Juhui, et al. Application of zipper fracturing of horizontal cluster wells in the Changning shale gas pilot zone, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2015,35(1):81-84.

昭通国家级示范区页岩气一体化高效开发模式及实践启示

High-efficiency integrated shale gas development model of Zhaotong National Demonstration Zone and its practical enlightenment

PDF (PC)

评审附件

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	周小金, 雍锐, 范宇, 曾波, 宋毅, 郭兴午, 周拿云, 段希宇, 朱仲义. 天然裂缝对页岩气水平井压裂的影响及工艺调整[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(6): 94-104.
[2]	宋林伟, 王小善, 许海涛, 王一重, 王恺. 梦想云推动地震资料处理解释一体化应用[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(5): 43-49.
[3]	李国欣, 朱如凯. 中国石油非常规油气发展现状、挑战与关注问题[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(2): 1-13.
[4]	孙焕泉, 周德华, 蔡勋育, 王烽, 冯动军, 卢婷. 中国石化页岩气发展现状与趋势[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(2): 14-26.
[5]	万绪新, 谢广龙, 丁余刚. 胜利油田难动用石油储量地质工程一体化探索[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(2): 43-50.
[6]	黄伟和, 刘海. 页岩气一体化开发钻井投资优化分析方法研究[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(2): 51-61.
[7]	杨智, 唐振兴, 陈旋, 郭旭光, 李国会, 吴颜雄, 黄东, 江涛, 方向, 王岚, 吴因业, 赵家宏, 王天煦, 刘俊田, 贾希玉. “进源找油”：致密油主要类型及地质工程一体化进展[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(2): 73-83.
[8]	舒红林, 王利芝, 尹开贵, 李庆飞, 张卓, 罗瑀峰. 地质工程一体化实施过程中的页岩气藏地质建模[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(2): 84-95.
[9]	张辉, 杨海军, 尹国庆, 王海应, 徐珂, 刘新宇, 王志民. 地质工程一体化关键技术在克拉苏构造带高效开发中的应用实践[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(2): 120-132.
[10]	廖高龙, 郭书生, 胡益涛, 梁豪, 高永德, 王世越, 赵凯. 地质工程一体化理念在南海高温高压井的实践[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(2): 142-154.
[11]	冯张斌, 马福建, 陈波, 李德胜, 常波涛, 冷先刚, 柴慧强, 吴凯, 杨永兴, 王永康, 黄勇杰, 丁黎, 李治君, 卢庆治, 潘元炜, 胡中, 付在荣, 王维. 鄂尔多斯盆地长7 致密油地质工程一体化解决方案 ——针对科学布井和高效钻井[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(2): 155-168.
[12]	李国欣, 王峰, 皮学军, 刘合. 非常规油气藏地质工程一体化数据优化应用的思考与建议[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(2): 147-152.
[13]	田军, 刘洪涛, 滕学清, 蔡振忠, 张辉, 曹立虎. 塔里木盆地克拉苏构造带超深复杂气田井全生命周期地质工程一体化实践[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(2): 165-173.
[14]	谢军, 鲜成钢, 吴建发, 赵春段. 长宁国家级页岩气示范区地质工程一体化最优化关键要素实践与认识[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(2): 174-185.
[15]	孙宏亮, 梁瑜, 王晶, 钱峰, 崔彦立, 罗珺, 王波, 杨莹. 吐哈油田复杂油藏勘探地质工程一体化精细管理实践[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(2): 196-202.