中国石油勘探 ›› 2025, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 42-57.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2025.06.004

• 勘探管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

油气田操作成本预测方法研究与应用——以西部深层、超深层油气田为例

吉云刚1,2,3,仝可佳1,2,3,杨俊丰1,2,3,吉万成1,2,3,杨露1,2,3,付宁1,2,3,王好4,赵蒙5   

  1. 1 中国石油塔里木油田公司勘探开发研究院;2 中国石油天然气集团有限公司超深层复杂油气藏勘探开发技术研发中心;3 新疆维吾尔自治区超深层复杂油气藏勘探开发工程研究中心;4 中国石油勘探开发研究院;5 中国石油昆仑数智公司
  • 出版日期:2025-11-14 发布日期:2025-11-14
  • 作者简介:吉云刚(1979 年),男,河南人,硕士,2002 年毕业于江汉石油学院,高级工程师,现从事油气藏评价、勘探开发规划与经济评价等工作。新疆库尔勒市塔里木油田勘探开发研究院,841000。

Research and Application of Operating Cost Prediction Methods for Oil and Gas Fields: A Case Study of Deep and Ultra-Deep Reservoirs in Western China

Ji Yungang1,2,3,Tong Kejia1,2,3,Yang Junfeng1,2,3,Ji Wancheng1,2,3,Yang Lu1,2,3,Fu Ning1,2,3,Wang Hao4,Zhao Meng5   

  1. 1.PetroChina Talimu Oil Company;2.R&D Center for Ultra-Deep Complex Reservoir Exploration and Development, CNPC.3.Engineering Research Center for Ultra-Deep Complex Reservoir Exploration and Development, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region.4.Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, PetroChina;5. PetroChina KUNLUN AI Company
  • Online:2025-11-14 Published:2025-11-14

摘要: 操作成本准确预测和精细评价是石油企业推动精益化管理和成本控减的重要手段。为此,以西部深层、超深层油气田为例,提出了基于成本构成的操作成本预测方法和操作成本预测的主成份模型预测方法,可为开发方案设计、财务预算编制、生产经营优化部署以及油气发展战略制定提供了评价手段和决策依据。研究表明,两类操作成本预测方法是具有较好可操作性和可靠性的适用方法。基于成本构成的操作成本预测方法是从操作成本的构成要素入手,聚焦费用定额,可视具体情况,选择常用模式、常用备选模式和深层模式进行操作成本预测;基于对标的成本定额辅助决策方法和操作成本与埋深的规律性研究是确保基于成本构成的操作成本预测结果合理性的两类保障机制;定额的合理选取和准确界定是该方法有效运用的关键,在涉及利用历史定额时,一般建议采用历史三年平均。操作成本预测的主成份模型预测方法是从影响操作成本的地质、开发和经营等技术经济指标要素入手,通过多因素降维处理和基于历史样本的回归,对操作成本进行宏观预测;操作成本历史样本的全面性和代表性是决定操作成本预测的主成份模型精度的关键。

关键词: 油气田, 操作成本, 预测, 成本定额, 主成份, 深层和超深层

Abstract: Accurate prediction and refined assessment of operating costs constitute a significant tool for petroleum enterprises to advance lean management and cost control. To this end, targeting deep and ultra-deep oil and gas fields in Western China, we propose two operating cost prediction methods: Cost Component-Based Operating Cost Prediction Method & Principal Component Model-Based Prediction Method. These approaches provide robust evaluation tools and decision-making foundations for development plan design, financial budgeting, operational optimization, and strategic formulation in oil and gas development. Studies confirm both methods exhibit strong practicability and reliability. Cost composition-based operating cost forecasting method starts from the components of operating costs, focuses on cost norms, and selects common modes, common alternative modes, or deep modes for operating cost forecasting according to specific situations. The benchmarking-based cost norm auxiliary decision-making method and the research on the regularity between operating costs and burial depth are two types of guarantee mechanisms to ensure the rationality of the cost composition-based operating cost forecasting results. The reasonable selection and accurate definition of norms are the key to the effective application of this method. When historical norms are involved, it is generally recommended to use the three-year historical average. The Principal Component Modelbased forecasting method for operating costs begins with techno-economic indicators—covering geological, developmental, and operational factors—that influence these costs. It conducts macro-level operating cost predictions through multi-factor dimensionality reduction and regression based on historical samples. The comprehensiveness and representativeness of historical operating cost samples are critical determinants of the model’s accuracy.

Key words: Oilfield, Operating, Cost Prediction, Cost Component, Principal Component, Deep and Ultra-deep

中图分类号: